Publicación:
Cartografía del sexismo y brechas de género en estudios sobre ingeniería latinoamericana (2018-2025)

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorMedina Reyes, María Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Miraz, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorPastrana Quintana, Camilo Andres
dc.contributor.authorViloria Núñez, Cesar Augusto
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Desarrollo, Salud y Desempeño Humano
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Educación e Innovación Educativa
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Tecnologías Aplicadas y Sistemas de Información (GRITAS)
dc.coverage.regionAmérica Latina
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-28T14:54:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-07-27
dc.descriptionContiene mapas
dc.description.abstractEste artículo presenta una revisión bibliográfica de estudios relacionados con el sexismo en carreras de ingeniería en América Latina. Objetivo: el objetivo principal es visibilizar el actual estado del conocimiento regional sobre la desigualdad de género en el ámbito de la enseñanza en ingeniería de esta región. Metodología: a través de una revisión sistemática sobre trabajos recientes relacionados con el sexismo, la ingeniería y la educación superior en América Latina, quedó conformado un corpus de diecinueve (19) estudios, de los cuales siete (7) son artículos científicos. Posteriormente se realizó una segunda búsqueda exclusiva de artículos científicos sobre brecha de género, ingeniería y educación superior en América Latina (N = 22) con el objetivo de comparar los resultados con la revisión anterior. Resultados: los hallazgos evidencian que la comunidad académica que investiga sobre esta temática muestra una tendencia a presentar estudios aplicados que son publicados en congresos y revistas científicas de carácter multidisciplinar, generalmente de acceso abierto y bajo cuartil. Aunque las líneas de investigación suelen converger en los mismos tópicos, se presentan importantes diferencias en función de la terminología empleada. Conclusiones: se recomienda diseñar investigaciones con muestras multinacionales y mayor rigor metodológico para superar las limitaciones identificadas.spa
dc.description.researchareaSalud y sociedad
dc.format.extent27 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationMedina-Reyes, M. F., Vázquez-Miraz, P., Pastrana-Quintana, C. A. & Viloria-Núñez, C. (2026). Cartografía del sexismo y brechas de género en estudios sobre ingeniería latinoamericana (2018-2025). Educación y Humanismo, 28(51), pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.28.51.8635
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.28.51.8635
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/14533
dc.language.isospa
dc.relation.referencesAguillo, I. F. (2021). Detergentes, cuñados y las revistas MDPI. Anuario ThinkEPI, 15, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.3145/thinkepi.2021.e15e03
dc.relation.referencesAlvarenga, C., & Braga, C. (2024). Assessing the effects of gender stereotype in STEM in a Brazilian university. EconomiA, 25(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECON-05-2022-0025
dc.relation.referencesArroyave-Rincón, J., & Escobar-Ortiz, J. M. (2021). Production of ignorance and the gender gap in STEM: an approach to engineering education. Sociología y Tecnociencia, 11(Extra 1), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.Extra_1.2021.139-159
dc.relation.referencesBarker, L. J., McDowell, C., & Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. SIGCSE’09 - Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.
dc.relation.referencesBeroíza-Valenzuela, A., & Salas-Guzmán, N. (2024). A systematic review of gender gaps in STEM: A decade of research (2012–2022). Frontiers in Education, 9, 1378640. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1378640
dc.relation.referencesBlair, E. E., Miller, R. B., Ong, M., & Zastavker, Y. V. (2017). Undergraduate STEM Instructors’ Teacher Identities and Discourses on Student Gender Expression and Equity. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 14-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20157
dc.relation.referencesBerniell, I., Fernández, R., & Krutikova, S. (2023). Desigualdad de género en América Latina y el Caribe. https://doi.org/10.18235/0005328
dc.relation.referencesBonilla-Algovia, E. (2021). Acceptance of ambivalent sexism in trainee teachers in Spain and Latin American countries. Anales de Psicología, 37(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.441791
dc.relation.referencesBuenestado, M., Ibarra-Vázquez, G., Patiño, A., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2024). Stories about gender inequalities and influence factors: a science club case study. International Journal of Science Education, 46(5), 403-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2235456
dc.relation.referencesBuquet, A., Mingo, A., & Moreno, H. (2018). Imaginario occidental y expulsión de las mujeres de la educación superior. Revista de la Educación Superior, 47(185), 83-108.
dc.relation.referencesCadaret, M. C., Hartung, P. J., Subich, L. M., & Weigold, I. K. (2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002
dc.relation.referencesCardona, J., Casas, L., Cañon, S., Castaño, J., Godoy, A., Henao, D., & Valencia, L. (2015). Sexismo y concepciones de la violencia de género contra la mujer en cuatro universidades de la ciudad de Manizales (Colombia), 2015. Archivos de Medicina, 15(2), 200-219. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=273843539005
dc.relation.referencesCarr, P. L., Helitzer, D., Freund, K., Westring, A., McGee, R., Campbell, P. B., Wood, C. V., & Villablanca, A. (2019). A Summary Report from the Research Partnership on Women in Science Careers. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(3), 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4547-y
dc.relation.referencesCarreras, P. E., & Guiñazu, M. L. (2024). 2023 SPE Diversity and Inclusion Survey: Driving Equality in the Energy Industry. Proceedings SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2024-Septe. https://doi.org/10.2118/220824-MS
dc.relation.referencesCeci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 15(3), 75-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236
dc.relation.referencesCharlesworth, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228-7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019
dc.relation.referencesCosta-Lizama, G., San-Martín, L., Pinto, Ó., & Gatica, G. (2022). Hack4women: un paso hacia la equidad de género. Texto Livre, 15, 39348. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2022.39348
dc.relation.referencesCosta, L. F. C., Nascimento, L. M. A., Lima, Y. O., Santos, A. M., Barbosa, C. E., Xexéo, G., & de Souza, J. M. (2024). Women’s journey in STEM education in Brazil: A rapid review on engineering and computer science. IEEE Access, 12(1), 112576-112593. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3442879
dc.relation.referencesDe Rezende, L. R., Castelo Branco, V. T. F., Savasini, K. V., Da Luz, M. P., Casagrande, M. D.T., Thives, L. P., Lucena, L. C. F. L., & Bernucci, L. L. B. (2025). Criteria for ResearchProductivity Grants in Brazil Applied to Civil Engineering: Reflections on GenderDifferences and the Current Context. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 97(1).https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202520240562
dc.relation.referencesDel Barco-León, M. F., Cordero-Araya, H., Ramos-Con, P., Rodríguez-Delgado, C., Dittel-Tortós, V., Araya-Chacón, C., Ramírez-Arana, S., & Mora-Chacón, M. F. (2022). Replicable methodology for the creation of anti-harassment policies for independent aerospace student groups as exemplified by the case of TECSpace. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress Iac, 2022-Septe.
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, A., Rosa, A., Etcheverry, L., Sosa, R., Marzoa, M., & Bakala, E. (2019). Encouraging girls involvement in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) careers in Uruguay. CLEI Electronic Journal, 22(2), 4.
dc.relation.referencesDíaz, K., Ravest, J., & Queupil, J. P. (2019). Brechas de género en los resultados de pruebas de selección universitaria en Chile. ¿Qué sucede en los extremos superior e inferior de la distribución de puntajes? Pensamiento Educativo. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 56(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.56.1.2019.5
dc.relation.referencesDulce, O. V., Maldonado, D., & Sánchez, F. (2022). Is the proportion of female STEM teachers in secondary education related to women’s enrollment in tertiary education STEM programs? International Journal of Educational Development, 91, 102591.
dc.relation.referencesElías M., Pérez J., Cassot, M. R., Carrasco, E. A, Tomljenovic, M., & Zúñiga, E. A. (2022). Development of digital and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics skills in chemistry teacher training. Frontiers in Education, 7, 932609. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.932609
dc.relation.referencesEllis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave stem pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS ONE, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
dc.relation.referencesEspinoza, A. M., & Albornoz, N. (2023). Sexismo en Educación Superior: ¿Cómo se Reproduce la Inequidad de Género en el contexto Universitario? Psykhe (Santiago), 32(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2021.35613
dc.relation.referencesFalkner, K., Szabo, C., Michell, D., Szorenyi, A., & Thyer, S. (2015). Gender gap in Academia: Perceptions of female computer science academics. Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, 2015-June, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1145/2729094.2742595
dc.relation.referencesGallego, L., & Casadiego, M. (2023). A Gender Gap Analysis on Academic Performance in Engineering Students on Admission and Exit Standardized Tests. Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(3), 103276. http://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.103276
dc.relation.referencesGallego-Morón, N. (2018). Gender discrimination in the Argentine University System | Discriminación de Género en el Sistema Universitario Argentino. Revista Estudios Feministas, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2018v26n251339
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, L., & Cantillo, V. (2018). Factors influencing the academic performance in standardized tests of computer science/engineering students in Colombia. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(Extra 3), 1073-1084.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Holgado, A., González-González, C., Frango, I., & García-Peñalvo, F. (2022). A Case Study in Brazil and Spain about the Students’ Perception of the Gender Gap in Computing. International Journal of Engineering Education, 38(3), 663-672.
dc.relation.referencesGasull, V. L., Gimeno, P. B., & Savini, C. A. (2020). Study on gender equity in job searches carried out by consultants specialized in personnel selection for engineering professionals. Proceedings of the Laccei International Multi Conference for Engineering Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2020.1.1.644
dc.relation.referencesGenes, G., Serrato, P., Suarez, N., Higuita, F., Usme, O. & Gómez, K. (2021). Creencias sexistas y actitudes de violencia de género. Situación de estudiantes universitario del área de la salud. Cartagena-Colombia. Enfermería global: Revista electrónica trimestral de enfermería, 20(2), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.427171
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Soler, S., Abadía, L. K., & Bernal, G. L. (2020). Women in STEM: does college boost their performance? Higher Education, 79, 849-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00441-0
dc.relation.referencesGupta, A., Garg, D., & Kumar, P. (2018). Analysis of students’ ratings of teaching quality to understand the role of gender and socio-economic diversity in higher education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(4), 319-327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2018.2814599
dc.relation.referencesGutiérrez, E. D., Santacruz, E., Morocho, M., Iza, P., & López, A. (2023). Gender and social differences affecting physics learning of Ecuadorian engineering students. Proceedings of the Laccei International Multi Conference for Engineering Education and Technology, 2023-July. https://laccei.org/LACCEI2023-BuenosAires/papers/Contribution_801_a.pdf
dc.relation.referencesGuzmán-Pardo, M. A., & Herrera-Quintero, L. K. (2023). Women at the Faculty of Engineering of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota Campus: History, Present, and Future. Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(2), 101200. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.101200
dc.relation.referencesHamid, N. E., & Torres-Madronero, M. C. (2020). The Gender Gap in Engineering Programs in Colombia. Ingeniería e Investigación, 41(2), 86758. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v41n2.86758
dc.relation.referencesHandley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015). Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(43), 13201-13206. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510649112
dc.relation.referencesHechavarría, P. Y., & Hernández, A. (2023). The gender perspective: a need in the professional training of the engineer in computer science | La perspectiva de género: una necesidad en la formación profesional del ingeniero en ciencias informáticas. Universidad y Sociedad, 15(1), 664-671.
dc.relation.referencesHernández Herrera, C. A., & Hernández Herrera, M. C. (2023). Revelando la brecha de género en STEM: experiencias de mujeres egresadas de un Instituto Tecnológico Federal. Acta Universitaria, 33, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.15174/au.2023.3862
dc.relation.referencesHerrera-Franco, G., Peña-Villacreseses, G., & Bravo-Montero, L. (2025). Women’s participation in the research development of a country. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100413.
dc.relation.referencesKuchynka, S. L., Salomon, K., Bosson, J. K., El-Hout, M., Kiebel, E., Cooperman, C., & Toomey, R. (2018). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism and College Women’s STEM Outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317741889
dc.relation.referencesLobo de Aguiar, L., Hughes, J., Lauschner, T., Nakamura, F., & De Freitas, R. (2018). Encouraging women to pursue a computer science career in the context of a third world country. Proceedings Frontiers in Education Conference Fie, 2018-Octob. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658572
dc.relation.referencesLondon, J. S., Lee, W. C., & Hawkins Ash, C. D. (2021). Potential engineers: A systematic literature review exploring Black children’s access to and experiences with STEM. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(4), 1003-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20426
dc.relation.referencesMartínez-Huerta, H., Chavarría-Garza, W.X., Aquines-Gutiérrez, O., & Santos-Guevara, A. (2024). Exploring the Gender Gap: Motivation, Procrastination, Environment, and Academic Performance in an Introductory Physics Course in a Human-Centered Private University in Northeast Mexico - A Case Study. Education Sciences, 14(186). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020186
dc.relation.referencesMcgee, E. O., Main, J. B., Miles, M. L., & Cox, M. F. (2021). An intersectional approach to investigating persistence among women of color tenure-track engineering faculty. In Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2020035632
dc.relation.referencesMlambo, Y. A., & Mabokela, R. O. (2017). ‘It’s more flexible’: persistence of women engineers in the academy. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1158790
dc.relation.referencesMontoya-Noguera, S., de Cajén, S. G., & Contreras-Ortiz, S. (2023). Building the Gender Gap Diagnostic Tool in CAL Matilda | Construcción del instrumento de diagnóstico de brecha de género en CAL Matilda. Proceedings of the Laccei International Multi Conference for Engineering Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2023.1.1.654
dc.relation.referencesMorales, S. & Morales, O. (2020). ¿Por qué hay pocas mujeres científicas? Una revisión de literatura sobre la brecha de género en carreras STEM. ADResearch ESIC International Journal of Communication Research, 22(22), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-022-06
dc.relation.referencesMorán-Soto, G., & González-Peña, O. I. (2022a). Mathematics Anxiety and Self-Efficacy of Mexican Engineering Students: Is There Gender Gap? Education Sciences, 12, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060391
dc.relation.referencesMorán-Soto, G., & González-Peña, O. I. (2022b). Second Phase of the Adaptation Process of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Survey (MSES) for the Mexican–Spanish Language: The Confirmation. Mathematics, 10, 2905. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162905
dc.relation.referencesMsambwa, M. M., Kangwa, D., Cai, L., & Fute, A. (2024). A systematic review using feminist perspectives on the factors affecting girls' participation in STEM subjects. Science & Education, 32(2). e22707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00524-0
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, T., Barcomb, A., De Souza Santos, R., Barros, H., Baldassarre, M. T., & França, C. (2024). Navigating the Path of Women in Software Engineering: From Academia to Industry. Proceedings International Conference on Software Engineering, 154-165. https://doi.org/10.1145/3639475.3640100
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz-Martínez, G., Vázquez-Villegas, P., Ruiz-Cantisani, M. I., Delgado, M., Conejo, D., & Membrillo, J. (2023). Analysis of the retention of women in higher education STEM programs. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(101). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01588-z
dc.relation.referencesPacheco-Figueroa, C. J., & Álvarez-Lemus, M. A. (2025). Mentoring women in STEM: empowering through social technologies for enhanced inclusivity and professional growth. A case study. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1512143. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1512143
dc.relation.referencesPranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
dc.relation.referencesQuiroz-Rojas, P., Martínez, R. R., & Palma, L. N. C. (2024). Role Models: A daily inspiration proposal in engineering. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2024.1.1.312
dc.relation.referencesRamos-Díaz, J., Ramos-Sandoval, R., & Barboza-Palomino, M. (2018). Social cognitive career theory: A qualitative approach in Peruvian engineering female students. Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Informática y Desarrollos de Investigación CACIDI 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACIDI.2018.8584366
dc.relation.referencesReynosa, G., & Aguilar, M. (2022). Analysis of the Participation of Female University Students in STEM/ICT Careers in El Salvador. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3321, 1-12.
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Ruiz, M. F., Noriega-Aranibar, M. T., & Pease-Dreibelbis, M. A. (2021). Brecha de género en la graduación de ingenieras industriales peruanas. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), 27(4), 341-360.
dc.relation.referencesSmith, K. N., & Gayles, J. G. (2018). “Girl Power”: Gendered academic and workplace experiences of College Women in Engineering. Social Sciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7010011
dc.relation.referencesStoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
dc.relation.referencesSuárez, M., Bentín, M., & Roggiero, A. (2023). Building Bridges: Gender Inclusion in Engineering Careers in Argentina | Tendiendo Puentes: La Inclusión de Género en las Carreras de Ingeniería en Argentina. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi Conference for Engineering Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18687/LEIRD2023.1.1.635
dc.relation.referencesTannenbaum, C., Ellis, R. P., Eyssel, F., Zou, J., & Schiebinger, L. (2019). Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature, 575(7781), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6
dc.relation.referencesTejuca, M. (2020). University and feminization: The Cuban experience | Universidad y feminización: La experiencia cubana. Educação e Pesquisa, 46, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202046216073
dc.relation.referencesTene-Tenempaguay, T., Hernández-Ramos, J., & Martínez-Abad, F. (2025). Análisis de la brecha de género en Matemáticas: un estudio incrustado. Educación y Humanismo, 27(49), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.27.49.7912
dc.relation.referencesTomás, M. & Guillamón, C. (2009). Las barreras y los obstáculos en el acceso de las profesoras universitarias a los cargos de gestión académica. Revista de Educación, 350, 253-275.
dc.relation.referencesVázquez-Miraz, P., Medina-Reyes, M. F., Pastrana Quintana, C. A., & Rincón Socha, M. E. (2022). Sex Role Ideology of Students in a Colombian Engineering Faculty. Masculinities and Social Change, 11(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.17583/MCS.8345
dc.relation.referencesVerdugo-Castro, S., García-Holgado, A., & Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2022). The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 8(8), e10300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300
dc.relation.referencesVillaseñor, T., Celis, S., Queupil, J. P., Pinto, L., & Rojas, M. (2020). The influence of early experiences and university environment for female students choosing geoscience programs: A case study at Universidad de Chile. Advances in Geosciences, 53, 227-244. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-53-227-2020
dc.relation.referencesWang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
dc.relation.referencesWilson, D., & Van Antwerp, J. (2021). Left Out: A Review of Women’s Struggle to Develop a Sense of Belonging in Engineering. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040791
dc.relation.referencesYepes, S. M., & Montes, W. F. (2023). Engineers’ self-perceived employability by gender and age: Implications for higher education. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2287928. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287928
dc.relation.referencesZapata, C., & Truyol, M. E. (2024). Gender Equity in Higher-Education Institutions: An Analysis of Student Perceptions in an Engineering School in Chile. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Conference Proceedings.
dc.relation.referencesZepeda Pérez, O. A., & Villagómez, G. (2021). Mujeres estudiantes de ingeniería: Una revisión sistemática de Iberoamérica. Revista Innovaciones Educativas, 23(35), 161-174.https://dx.doi.org/10.22458/ie.v23i35.3571
dc.rights.licenseAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)
dc.subject.ddc370 - Educación::378 - Educación superior (Educación terciaria)
dc.subject.lembMujeres en la educación superior
dc.subject.lembIngeniería -- Enseñanza
dc.subject.lembDiscriminación sexual en la educación
dc.subject.lembEquidad de género
dc.subject.lembSexismo
dc.subject.lembEducación superior -- América Latina
dc.subject.lembMujeres ingenieras
dc.subject.lembBrecha de género
dc.subject.lembRevisiones sistemáticas
dc.subject.ocde5. Ciencias Sociales
dc.subject.odsODS 5: Igualdad de género. Lograr la igualdad de género y empoderar a todas las mujeres y las niñas
dc.subject.proposalAmérica Latinaspa
dc.subject.proposalGénerospa
dc.subject.proposalIngenieríaspa
dc.subject.proposalRevisión sistemáticaspa
dc.subject.proposalSexismospa
dc.titleCartografía del sexismo y brechas de género en estudios sobre ingeniería latinoamericana (2018-2025)spa
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc0edc215-33d5-4577-a51c-f1b609158534
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1d24992c-2213-4e2b-a891-b8d849e838e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb4d6d6f9-177a-4f9f-ac98-9486dd0eef30
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationef7ccd85-aebf-4b7b-abb0-662939e5bd77
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc0edc215-33d5-4577-a51c-f1b609158534

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Articulo Cartografia Sexismo.pdf
Tamaño:
1.27 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Productos de investigación