Publicación:
Seismic fragility assessment of confined masonry houses in Colombia

dc.contributor.authorArchbold, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, Julian
dc.contributor.authorOrjuela Mejia, Johnatan
dc.contributor.authorPiedrahita González, Jefferson Andrés
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Materiales y Estructuras Continuas – GIMAT
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T20:41:37Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-16
dc.descriptionContiene ilustraciones, gráficos
dc.description.abstractConfined masonry (CM) houses are widely used in low- and mid-rise houses worldwide, especially in countries with emerging economies. CM emerged in Latin America as a response to the severe damage observed in unreinforced masonry buildings following significant earthquakes in the early twentieth century. In Colombia, CM construction dates back to the 1930s, with houses up to five stories tall. A key challenge in seismic risk estimation is predicting the behavior of prevalent construction typologies in a region to inform risk mitigation and management strategies. As a part of a larger project called the National Seismic Risk Model for Colombia, this study presents a seismic fragility assessment of CM houses, evaluating the effects of masonry strength, masonry unit type, wall density, construction quality, and number of stories. A total of 72 archetype houses, representative of Colombian CM structures, were analyzed across low, intermediate, and high seismicity zones. Nonlinear models were proposed and calibrated using quasi-static cyclic tests on confined masonry walls and shaking table tests on scaled buildings. For each archetype, nonlinear time history analyses were conducted in OpenSees, using approximately 370 hazard-consistent ground-motion records to represent the hazard at each site of interest. The results from these structural analyses are then combined with damage information to obtain fragility curves for this building typology. The fragility results of this study, combined with vulnerability functions, will serve as inputs to calculate risk metrics later on as part of the National Seismic Risk Model for Colombia. The present work provides a region-specific fragility assessment, calibrated with local experimental data, which enhances its applicability within Colombia and potentially to other Latin American countries with similar construction practices and standards. These findings can contribute directly to national seismic risk mitigation initiatives.eng
dc.format.extent26 Paginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationArchbold J, Carrillo J, Orjuela Mejia J, Piedrahita J. Seismic fragility assessment of confined masonry houses in Colombia. Earthquake Spectra. 2025;41(5):3586-3611. doi:10.1177/87552930251378782
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/87552930251378782
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/14299
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.placeColombia
dc.relation.referencesAbrahamson NA, Al Atik L (2010) Scenario spectra for design ground motions and risk calculation. In: Proceedings of the 9th U.S. national and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, 25 July. Available at: https://www.caee.ca/10CCEEpdf/2010EQConf-001896.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo AB, Yepes-Estrada C, González D, Silva V, Mora M, Arcila M, Posada G (2020) Seismic risk assessment for the residential buildings of the major three cities in Colombia: Bogotá, Medellín, and Cali. Earthquake Spectra 36(Suppl. 1): 298–320.
dc.relation.referencesAIS (2010) Colombian Seismic Design Code: NSR-10. Bogotá: AIS—Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica.
dc.relation.referencesArias Acosta JG (2005) Ensayos en mesa vibradora de un modelo a escala 1:2 de edificio de mampostería confinada de tres niveles [Master’s thesis]. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxiCo.
dc.relation.referencesArroyo O, Bonett R, Vidales F, Ocampo JJ, Feliciano D, Carrillo J, Novoa D (2025) Seismic fragility assessment of reinforced concrete wall buildings in Colombia: Insights and implications for earthquake-resistant design. Earthquake Spectra 41(1): 354–380.
dc.relation.referencesArteta CA, Abrahamson NA (2019) Conditional Scenario Spectra (CSS) for hazard-consistent analysis of engineering systems. Earthquake Spectra 35(2): 737–757.
dc.relation.referencesAsfura AP, Flores PJ (1999) Quindío, Colombia Earthquake of January 25, 1999: Reconnaissance Report (MCEER-99-0017): Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). Available at: https://www.eng.buffalo.edu/mceer-reports/99/99-0017.pdf
dc.relation.referencesAstroza IM, Schmidt AA (2004) Capacidad de deformación de muros de albañilería confinada para distintos niveles de desempeño. Revista de Ingeniería Sísmica 70: 59.
dc.relation.referencesBaker JW (2011) Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground-motion selection. Journal of Structural Engineering 137(3): 322–331.
dc.relation.referencesBaker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31(1): 579–599.
dc.relation.referencesBaker JW, Allin Cornell C (2005) A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34(10): 1193–1217.
dc.relation.referencesBorah B (2021) Seismic analysis and design of confined masonry buildings [Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati]. Available at: https://repository.iitg.ac.in/handle/123456789/1966
dc.relation.referencesBorah B, Kaushik HB, Singhal V (2021) Development of a novel V-D strut model for seismic analysis of confined masonry buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering 147(1): 04021001.
dc.relation.referencesBrzev S, Scawthorn C, Charleson AW, Allen L, Greene M, Jaiswal K, Silva V (2013) GEM Building Taxonomy Version 2.0 [Pdf]. GEM Technical Report 2013-02, 188 pages.
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo J, Rincón R (2023) Modelo de estados límite para componentes estructurales: Reporte MNRS No. 0010-2022. Informe Final [(Servicio Geológico Colombiano (SGC)]. Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Ingeniería (ACOFI).
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo J, González W, Benjumea J (2023) Cyclic stress–strain behavior of low-diameter reinforcing bars for thin concrete walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 21(12): 5505–5523.
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo J, Lozano H, Arteta C (2021) Mechanical properties of steel reinforcing bars for concrete structures in central Colombia. Journal of Building Engineering 33: 101858.
dc.relation.referencesChung R (1996) The January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake (NIST SP 901; 0 ed., p. NIST SP 901). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
dc.relation.referencesColeman J, Spacone E (2001) Localization issues in force-based frame elements. Journal of Structural Engineering 127(11): 1257–1265.
dc.relation.referencesCruz Sagastume O (2013) Tests of 7 Full-scale Confined Masonry Walls of Different Lengths with Multi-perforated Clay Units. Editorial Académica Española. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/dp/3659076279
dc.relation.referencesCSI (2015) ETABS: Integrated Building Design Software. Computers and Structures, Inc. Available at: https://www.csiamerica.com/products/etabs
dc.relation.referencesDANE (1999) Dimensión social y económica de los efectos del terremoto del Eje Cafetero: Diagnóstico para la reconstrucción. DANE, Bogotá, Colombia.
dc.relation.referencesDávalos H, Miranda E (2019) Filtered incremental velocity: A novel approach in intensity measures for seismic collapse estimation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48(12): 1384–1405.
dc.relation.referencesDeierlein G, Moehle J (2004) A Framework Methodology for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering.
dc.relation.referencesDiaz M, Zavala C, Gallardo J, Lavado L (2017) Experimental Study of Non-Engineered Confined Masonry Walls Retrofitted With Wire Mesh and Cement-Sand Mortar.
dc.relation.referencesDolšek M (2011) Simplified method for seismic risk assessment of buildings with consideration of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 8: 939–953.
dc.relation.referencesEads L, Miranda E, Lignos DG (2015) Average spectral acceleration as an intensity measure for collapse risk assessment. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44(12): 2057–2073.
dc.relation.referencesEguchi RT, Goltz JD, Taylor CE, Chang SE, Flores PJ, Johnson LA, Seligson HA, Blais NC (1998) Direct economic losses in the Northridge earthquake: A three-year post-event perspective. Earthquake Spectra 14(2): 245–264.
dc.relation.referencesFilippou FC, Fenves GL (2004) Methods of analysis for earthquake-resistant structures. In: Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-based Engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 6–1.
dc.relation.referencesGEM (2022) OpenQuake Vulnerability and Fragility Documentation. Available at: https://docs.openquake.org/vulnerability/fragility/index.html
dc.relation.referencesGonzales GH, Aguilar AG, Huaco G, Garber D (2020) Seismic performance and fragility functions of confined masonry old infrastructure with handmade bricks. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 999(1): 012006.
dc.relation.referencesGoogle LLC (2023) Google street view. Available at: https://www.google.com/maps
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero F, Ortiz AR, Carrillo J (2022) Bayesian uncertainty assessment for modulus of elasticity of concrete and mechanical properties of steel reinforcing bar. In: Noh HY, Whelan M, Harvey PS (eds) Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 2: Proceedings of the 40th IMAC, a conference and exposition on structural dynamics 2022. Cham: Springer, pp. 101–109.
dc.relation.referencesGünay S, Mosalam KM (2013) PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology, revisited. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17(6): 829–858.
dc.relation.referencesJansen DC, Shah SP (1997) Effect of length on compressive strain softening of concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 123(1): 25–35.
dc.relation.referencesJayaram N, Lin T, Baker JW (2011) A computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance. Earthquake Spectra 27(3): 797–815.
dc.relation.referencesKaushik HB, Rai DC, Jain SK (2007) Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19(9): 728–739.
dc.relation.referencesKent DC, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division 97(3): 1969–1990.
dc.relation.referencesKollerathu JA, Menon A (2017) Role of diaphragm flexibility modelling in seismic analysis of existing masonry structures. Structures 11: 22–39.
dc.relation.referencesLovon H, Tarque N, Silva V, Yepes-Estrada C (2018) Development of fragility curves for confined masonry buildings in Lima, Peru. Earthquake Spectra 34(3): 1339–1361.
dc.relation.referencesMcKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2010) Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24(1): 95–107.
dc.relation.referencesMaldonado Rondón E, Chio Cho G (2008) Vulnerabilidad Sísmica En Centros Urbanos. Santander: Ediciones Universidad Industrial de Santander.
dc.relation.referencesMarques R, Pereira JM, Lourenço PB (2020) Lateral in-plane seismic response of confined masonry walls: From numerical to backbone models. Engineering Structures 221: 111098.
dc.relation.referencesMartins L, Silva V (2021) Development of a fragility and vulnerability model for global seismic risk analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19(15): 6719–6745.
dc.relation.referencesMartins L, Silva V, Marques M, Crowley H, Delgado R (2016) Development and assessment of damage-to-loss models for moment-frame reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45(5): 797–817.
dc.relation.referencesMazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2007) OpenSees Command Language Manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA. Available at: https://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual/OpenSeesManual.pdf
dc.relation.referencesMeli R, Brzev S, Astroza M, Boen T, Crisafulli F, Dai J, Farsi M, Hart T, Mebarki A, Moghadam AS, Quiun D, Tomazevic M, Yamin L (2011) Seismic Design Guide for Low-rise Confined Masonry Buildings. Confined Masonry Network, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI); International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE). Available at: https://www.world-housing.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/ConfinedMasonryDesignGuide82011.pdf
dc.relation.referencesPorter K (2021) A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk. In: Beer M, Kougioumtzoglou IA, Patelli E, Au IS-K (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1–29.
dc.relation.referencesPortilla S, Reyes JC, Carrillo J, Lasso JE (2025) Mechanical properties of masonry using artificial neural networks. Earthquake Spectra 41(2): 1536–1564.
dc.relation.referencesPugh JS, Lowes LN, Lehman DE (2015) Nonlinear line-element modeling of flexural reinforced concrete walls. Engineering Structures 104: 174–192.
dc.relation.referencesRaghunandan M, Liel AB (2013) Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse. Structural Safety 41: 119–133.
dc.relation.referencesRaka E, Spacone E, Sepe V, Camata G (2015) Advanced frame element for seismic analysis of masonry structures: Model formulation and validation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 44(14): 2489–2506.
dc.relation.referencesRankawat N, Brzev S, Jain SK, Pérez Gavilán JJ (2021) Nonlinear seismic evaluation of confined masonry structures using equivalent truss model. Engineering Structures 248: 113114.
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo JI, Cowan HA (2000) The “Eje Cafetero” earthquake, Colombia of January 25, 1999. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 33(1): 1–29.
dc.relation.referencesRota M, Penna A, Magenes G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Engineering Structures 32(5): 1312–1323.
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-García J, Negrete M (2009) Drift-based fragility assessment of confined masonry walls in seismic zones. Engineering Structures 31(1): 170–181.
dc.relation.referencesSan Bartolomé A, Quiun D, Araoz T, Velezmoro J (2013, June) Seismic reinforcement of existing walls made of horizontally-hollow bricks. In: Proceedings of the 12Th Canadian Masonry Symposium. Available at: https://canadamasonrydesigncentre.com/download/12th_symposium/153.pdf
dc.relation.referencesScott BD, Park R, Priestley MN (1982) Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. Journal Proceedings 79(1): 13–27.
dc.relation.referencesSilva V, Crowley H, Pinho R, Varum H (2013) Extending displacement-based earthquake loss assessment (DBELA) for the computation of fragility curves. Engineering Structures 56: 343–356.
dc.relation.referencesSinghal V, Rai DC (2018) Behavior of confined masonry walls with openings under in-plane and out-of-plane loads. Earthquake Spectra 34(2): 817–841.
dc.relation.referencesSpacone E, Filippou FC, Taucer FF (1996) Fibre beam–column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: Part I. Formulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25(7): 711–725.
dc.relation.referencesTarque N, Manchego A, Lovón H, Blondet M, Varum H (2022) Experimental in-plane behaviour and drift-based fragility assessment of typical Peruvian confined masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials 341: 127893.
dc.relation.referencesTorrisi GS, Crisafulli FJ, Pavese A (2012) An innovative model for the in-plane nonlinear analysis of confined masonry and infilled frame structures. In: Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE). Available at: https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_0574.pdf
dc.relation.referencesUlrich T, Negulescu C, Douglas J (2014) Fragility curves for risk-targeted seismic design maps. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(4): 1479–1491.
dc.relation.referencesVamvatsikos D, Allin Cornell C (2006) Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through IDA. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35(9): 1097–1117.
dc.relation.referencesVillar-Vega M, Silva V, Crowley H, Yepes C, Tarque N, Acevedo AB, Hube MA, Gustavo CD, María HS (2017) Development of a fragility model for the residential building stock in South America. Earthquake Spectra 33(2): 581–604.
dc.relation.referencesYamín L, García L (1992) Investigaciones Experimentales Relacionadas Con La Vivienda De Bajo Costo En Colombia (CR3.1).
dc.relation.referencesYepes-Estrada C, Silva V, Valcárcel J, Acevedo AB, Tarque N, Hube MA, Coronel G, María HS (2017) Modeling the residential building inventory in South America for seismic risk assessment. Earthquake Spectra 33(1): 299–322.
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceEarthquake Spectra
dc.subject.ddc690 - Construcción de edificios::693 - Construcción en tipos específicos de materiales y propósitos específicos
dc.subject.lembMampostería confinada
dc.subject.lembIngeniería sísmica
dc.subject.lembRiesgo sísmico
dc.subject.lembAnálisis estructural no lineal
dc.subject.lembModelos estructurales
dc.subject.lembEnsayos sísmicos
dc.subject.lembConfined masonry
dc.subject.lembSeismic engineering
dc.subject.lembSeismic risk
dc.subject.lembNonlinear structural analysis
dc.subject.lembStructural models
dc.subject.lembSeismic tests
dc.subject.ocde2. Ingeniería y Tecnología::2A. Ingeniería Civil::2A01. Ingeniería civil
dc.subject.odsODS 9: Industria, innovación e infraestructura. Construir infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible y fomentar la innovación
dc.subject.odsODS 11: Ciudades y comunidades sostenibles. Lograr que las ciudades y los asentamientos humanos sean inclusivos, seguros, resilientes y sostenibles
dc.subject.proposalSeismic fragilityeng
dc.subject.proposalConfined masonryeng
dc.subject.proposalFragility functionseng
dc.subject.proposalNonlinear time history analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalProbabilistic seismic assessmenteng
dc.titleSeismic fragility assessment of confined masonry houses in Colombia
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dcterms.audienceComunidad Académica y Científicaspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication292466ca-8f40-437a-b6d4-ca6da3ac89a1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication4a47c4f6-9764-455f-a79d-db561133fc0c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione63d6ce8-5474-4e8c-9fe1-5b2a070c6913
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf730a56c-679c-47c2-adcc-1b76e99d600c
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione63d6ce8-5474-4e8c-9fe1-5b2a070c6913
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery292466ca-8f40-437a-b6d4-ca6da3ac89a1

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
archbold-et-al-2025-seismic-fragility-assessment-of-confined-masonry-houses-in-colombia.pdf
Tamaño:
5.09 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: