Academic research contributions from Ibero-American countries to general knowledge, engineering, and computer science up to 2023 and COVID impact

dc.contributor.authorCastillo-Velazquez, Jose-Ignacioeng
dc.contributor.authorHuerta, Monicaeng
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24 00:00:00
dc.date.available2024-12-24 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2024-12-24
dc.description.abstractAlthough commonly, competitive intelligence analysis is applied to companies, where new investments and operation expenditures are considered along with changes in the market, competitive intelligence can be applied to different countries' academic research production, which impacts science, technology and innovation making a difference in their competitiveness. This work shows the academic research production for all areas of knowledge, and also specifically for engineering and computer science, from all the Ibero-American countries, based on the SCOPUS database from 2001 to 2023. The results show that based on the volume of their academic production, for an affordable analysis, the Ibero-American countries can be classified into three groups, considering an order of magnitude difference for each group. The leading group is composed of countries producing between 200,000 and about 2 million documents, the second group of countries producing between 20,000 and 200,000 documents, and the third group of countries producing between 2,000 and 20,000 documents. The COVID pandemic impacted all the countries which showed a decrease in annual production over the last two years. The results also show the priority areas of knowledge that these countries invest in and the main countries that they collaborate with. The behavior of production for engineering and computer science is like that of general production, but there are some specific internal factors for specific countries such as in the case of Brazil, the country in which production fell most dramatically, followed by Spain and Colombia. On the other hand, Peru and Ecuador show a high interest in engineering and computer science. This work offers a high value decision-making tool to leaders in academic research, the principals of research driven institutions and investors from industry in Ibero-America. The academic production is related to the size of the GDP and the percentage of the GDP invested by a country in research development and innovation.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.identifier.doi10.32397/tesea.vol5.n2.631
dc.identifier.eissn2745-0120
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.32397/tesea.vol5.n2.631
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívareng
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.utb.edu.co/tesea/article/download/631/428
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2024 : Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applicationseng
dc.relation.citationendpage21
dc.relation.citationissue2eng
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume5eng
dc.relation.ispartofjournalTransactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applicationseng
dc.relation.referencesB Gay. Competitive intelligence and complex systems. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 2(2):5–14, 2012. [2] Dhekra Ben Sassi, Anissa Frini, Wahiba Ben Abdessalem, and Naoufel Kraiem. Competitive intelligence: History, importance, objectives, process and issues. In 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pages 486–491, 2015. [3] Stephanie Hughes and Rebecca J White. Improving strategic planning and implementation in universities through competitive intelligence tools: A means to gaining relevance. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 10(3):39–52, 2005. [4] Montserrat Garcia-Alsina, Eva Ortoll, and Josep Cobarsí-Morales. Enabler and inhibitor factors influencing competitive intelligence practices. In Aslib Proceedings, pages 262–288. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013. [5] Nur Rahmi, Parmin Ishak, and Nurhayati Oli’i. Understanding the relationship between competitive intelligence and strategic management of universities: A critical review. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 7(2):71–81, 2020. [6] Montserrat Garcia-Alsina, Josep Cobarsi-Morales, and Eva Ortoll. Competitive intelligence theoretical framework and practices: The case of Spanish universities. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(1):57–75, 2016. [7] Agus Purwanto. Effect of hard skills, soft skills, organizational learning and innovation capability on Islamic University lecturers’ performance. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 2020. [8] Kevin L Hammond, Harry A Harmon, and Robert L Webster. University performance and strategic marketing: An extended study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(5):436–459, 2007. [9] Montserrat Garcia-Alsina, Eva Ortoll, and Alexandre López-Borrull. Aplicaciones emergentes de inteligencia competitiva en las universidades. El Profesional de la Información, 20(5):503–509, 2011. [10] Carlos De las Heras-Rosas and Juan Herrera. Innovation and competitive intelligence in business. A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(2):31, 2021. [11] José Ricardo López-Robles, Jose Ramón Otegi-Olaso, I Porto Gómez, and Manuel J Cobo. 30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Information Management, 48:22–38, 2019. [12] Cynthia A Bulley, Kofi F Baku, and Michael M Allan. Competitive intelligence information: A key business success factor. J. Mgmt. & Sustainability, 4:82, 2014. [13] Alexandra Witze. Universities will never be the same. Nature, 582(7811):162–164, 2020. [14] Peter Thiel y Blake Masters. Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future. Planeta, 2014. [15] Melik Kaylan De Douglas E. Schoen. The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and Americas Crisis of Leadership. Encounter Books, 2014. [16] Niall Ferguson. Competing Visions of World Order. Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, USA, 2021. [17] International Monetary Fund. World economic outlook database, 2023. Retrieved December 2023, 2023. [18] The World Bank. Research and development expenditure, 2023. Retrieved 31 December 2023, 2023. [19] Jose-Ignacio Castillo-Velazquez and Rafaela-Blanca Silva-Lopez. Tuning to ADVNETLAB methodology for thesis advisory in science and engineering for ICT. In 2018 IEEE XXV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON), pages 1–4. IEEE, 2018. [20] Jose-Ignacio Castillo-Velazquez, Rafaela-Blanca Silva-Lopez, and Mónica-Karel Huerta. ADVNETLAB methodology: How to improve quality in software development and engineering projects. In 2020 IEEE ANDESCON, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2020. [21] Pedro Fiori Arantes. Higher education in dark times: From the democratic renewal of Brazilian universities to its current wreck. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(2):131–157, 2021. [22] University of Toronto. U of T President Emeritus David Naylor calls for continued support of science: University affairs, 2019. [23] Alfredo Alejandro Gugliano. La política universitaria del gobierno Bolsonaro y las reacciones de la comunidad científica brasileña. Cuadernos de Política Exterior Argentina, 130:93–96, 2019. [24] Luciana Amaral. Mec deve cortar r$ 1,4 bi de verba de universidades e institutos em 2021, 2020. [25] Clara Lucía Guzmán Aguilera. La política científica colombiana desde 1990. Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, 10(1), 2019. [26] Ministerio de Educacion de Colombia, 2019. [27] Laura Wills-Otero and Christian Iván Benito. De Uribe a Santos: Cambios y continuidades de la política colombiana en 2011. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 32(1):87–107, 2012. [28] María Teresa González Carrasco. La nueva ley universitaria peruana y el ascenso de la educación superior técnica. Revista de Educación Superior en América Latina, 2020. [29] CIES. El consorcio de investigación económica y social, 2023. [30] Consejo Nacional de Ciencia. Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica. Política nacional para el desarrollo de la ciencia, tecnología e innovación tecnológica-cti, 2016. [31] Luisa Fernanda Echeverría-King, Jorge Pinto, and María Ángela Lorena Mosquera-Montoya. Inversión en actividades de ciencia, tecnología e innovación: el caso de colombia y ecuador (investment in science, technology, and innovation activities: The case of colombia and ecuador). Revista CEA, 7(14), 2021. [32] Congreso del Ecuador. Ley organica de educación superior, 2010. [33] CONACYT Paraguay et al. Política nacional de ciencia y tecnología, 2002.eng
dc.rightsJose-Ignacio Castillo-Velazquez, Monica Huerta - 2024eng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng
dc.rights.creativecommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.utb.edu.co/tesea/article/view/631eng
dc.subjectCompetitive Intelligenceeng
dc.subjectacademic publishingeng
dc.subjectEngineeringeng
dc.subjectComputer Scienceseng
dc.subjectCOVIDeng
dc.titleAcademic research contributions from Ibero-American countries to general knowledge, engineering, and computer science up to 2023 and COVID impactspa
dc.title.translatedAcademic research contributions from Ibero-American countries to general knowledge, engineering, and computer science up to 2023 and COVID impactspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng

Archivos