Identifying disruptive innovation in the IT sector: a framework for evaluating intercompany impact
| dc.contributor.author | Rouhani Zeidanloo, Hossein | eng |
| dc.contributor.author | Špaček, Miroslav | eng |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-06 00:00:00 | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-06 00:00:00 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In the dynamic Information Technology (IT) sector, accurately assessing disruptive potential is crucial for companies aiming to maintain competitive advantages and preempt emerging threats. This study introduces a robust framework for evaluating the disruptive potential of IT companies, with a specific focus on company-to-company impacts. Our approach diverges from traditional models by integrating a holistic, multi-dimensional perspective that includes business model innovation, market dynamics, network effects, and customer adoption trends. Our approach incorporates a situational model that contextualizes disruptive dynamics within specific industry conditions, alongside a scoring model that systematically quantifies the potential impact of innovations. The framework was developed through an extensive literature review, expert interviews, and an analysis of both historical and contemporary case studies. Specifically, the historical case study examines Apple's disruption of Nokia in the smartphone market, while the contemporary case study analyzes the competitive dynamics between Mondoo and Lacework in the cybersecurity domain. These case studies provide an in-depth application of the framework, demonstrating its utility in both retrospective analysis and real-time market evaluation. This development process was significantly enriched by the primary author’s direct industry experience in a Silicon Valley cybersecurity startup, ensuring that the framework addresses real-world complexities and needs. Our research contributes a practical tool adapted to the IT sector's unique characteristics, offering strategic insights for IT professionals, strategists, and policymakers to effectively navigate and leverage disruption opportunities. The practical applications of this framework extend beyond academic discussion, providing actionable guidance for identifying and addressing potential disruptions in the IT landscape. | eng |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | eng |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.32397/tesea.vol6.n1.724 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2745-0120 | |
| dc.identifier.url | https://doi.org/10.32397/tesea.vol6.n1.724 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | eng |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar | eng |
| dc.relation.bitstream | https://revistas.utb.edu.co/tesea/article/download/724/445 | |
| dc.relation.citationedition | Núm. 1 , Año 2025 : Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications | eng |
| dc.relation.citationendpage | 45 | |
| dc.relation.citationissue | 1 | eng |
| dc.relation.citationstartpage | 1 | |
| dc.relation.citationvolume | 6 | eng |
| dc.relation.ispartofjournal | Transactions on Energy Systems and Engineering Applications | eng |
| dc.relation.references | B. Gates. Famous bill gates quotes and quotations, 2008. http://www.quotesandsayings.com/quotes/bill-gates/. [2] C. Viloria-Núñez, F. J. Vázquez, and C. M. Fernández-Márquez. A review of the digital transformation maturity models for smes in search of a self-assessment. In 2022 IEEE ANDESCON, pages 1–6, 2022. [3] César Viloria-Núñez, Alexandra Tapias-Meza, and Diego Gomez-Ceron. Reflection on the ict adoption pillar in the departmental competitiveness index in colombia: The case of atlántico. 2024 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM), pages 1–8, August 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ COLCOM62950.2024.10720244. [4] M. Jimeno, C. Viloria-Núñez, N. D. T. Manosalva, and S. D. A. Coll. Prioritization of ict investment projects to reduce the digital divide in the colombian caribbean region. In 2023 IEEE Colombian Caribbean Conference (C3), pages 1–6, 2023. [5] C. M. Christensen. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997. [6] C. G. Gilbert. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5):741–763, 2005. [7] V. Govindarajan and P. Kopalle. The usefulness of measuring disruptiveness of innovations ex post in making ex ante predictions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1):12–18, 2006. [8] C. Markides. Disruptive innovation: In need of better theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1):19–25, 2006. [9] M. L. Tushman and C. A. O’Reilly. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4):8–30, 2006. [10] J. A. Schumpeter. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers, New York, 1976. [11] W. B. Arthur. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. 2009. [12] E. Ramos-Hidalgo, J. N. Edeh, and F. J. Acedo. Innovation adaptation and post-entry growth in international new ventures. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1):100169, 2022. [13] C. K. Prahalad and V. Ramaswamy. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3):5–14, 2004. [14] M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3):424–440, 1985. [15] C. Shapiro and H. R. Varian. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1999. [16] T. L. Friedman. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, 2005. [17] G. J. Tellis. Disruptive technology or visionary leadership? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1):34–38, 2006. [18] S. Günther, W. Tim, and F. Florian. Customer need-based product positioning for disruptive innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2):201–220, 2021. [19] G. Parker, M. Van Alstyne, and S. P. Choudary. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. [20] J. Füller, K. Matzler, and M. Hoppe. Brand community members as a source of innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6):851–867, 2008. [21] O. Gassmann, K. Frankenberger, and M. Csik. The business model navigator: 55 models that will revolutionise your business. 2014. [22] D. J. Teece. Business models, business strategy, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3):172–194, 2010. [23] W. Zhang, T. Daim, and Q. Zhang. Understanding the disruptive business model innovation of e-business microcredit: A comparative case study in china. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(7):765–777, 2018. [24] Limin Zou, Wan Li, Hongyi Wu, and Jiawen Liu. Measuring corporate digital transformation: Methodology, indicators and applications. Sustainability, 16(10):4087, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104087. [25] C. Christensen, M. E. Raynor, and R. McDonald. What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12):44–53, 2015. [26] Yongchao Zeng, Hua Fu, Zixiang Wei, Yingying Shi, and Muhammad Wasif Zafar. Conceptualizing disruptive innovation: An interpretive structural model approach. Journal of Disruptive Innovation Studies, 2, 2023. Published: 20 April 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1000/jdis.2023.03. [27] Ron Adner and Rahul Kapoor. Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology s-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4):625–648, 2016. [28] R. Adner and P. Zemsky. Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(2):229–254, 2001. [29] R. Adner. When are technologies disruptive? a demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8):667–688, 2002. [30] S. Lee, B. Yoon, and Y. Park. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach. Technovation, 34(3):126–140, 2014. [31] S. Kim, J. Yoon, S. Choi, and H. Park. Toward a new paradigm on credit scoring for young people: Decision trees and social networking sites. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(7):3128–3136, 2014. [32] Marco Martini, Frank Tietze, Matthias John, Leonidas Aristodemou, Anne Schönmann, and Stefan Schimpf. Conceptualizing disruptive innovation paths, patent zero and patent-data based operationalization. Technical Report 5/24, CTM Working Papers, University of Cambridge, 2024. Accepted and presented at the 2024 ISPIM conference. Available via Fraunhofer Publica: https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-3571. [33] Leonidas Aristodemou. Identifying valuable patents: A deep learning approach. PhD thesis, PhD thesis, 2021. [34] Leonidas Aristodemou and Frank Tietze. The state-of-the-art on intellectual property analytics (ipa): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (ip) data. World Patent Information, 55:37–51, 2018. [35] Y. Jeong, L. Aristodemou, and F. Tietze. Exploring disruptive innovation opportunity using deep learning. In The R&D Management 2019 Conference, 2019. [36] M. Park, E. Leahey, and R. J. Funk. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613(7942):138–144, 2023. [37] P. C. Bhatt, K.-K. Lai, V. A. Drave, T.-C. Lu, and V. Kumar. Patent analysis based technology innovation assessment with the lens of disruptive innovation theory: A case of blockchain technological trajectories. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196:122864, 2023. [38] Ming Xiang, Dandan Fu, and Kaibo Lv. Identifying and predicting trends of disruptive technologies: An empirical study based on text mining and time series forecasting. Sustainability, 15(6):5412, 2023. [39] R. Li, W. Yu, Q. Huang, and Q. Chen. A new identify disruptive technologies algorithm based on technology develop network. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022:1–10, 2022. [40] X. Li, Q. Xie, and L. Huang. Identifying the development trends of emerging technologies using patent analysis and web news data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69:2603–2618, 2022. [41] W. Jia, S. Wang, Y. Xie, Z. Chen, and K. Gong. Disruptive technology identification of intelligent logistics robots in aiot industry: Based on attributes and functions analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39:557–568, 2022. [42] A. Adamuthe and G. Thampi. Technology forecasting: A case study of computational technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143:181–189, 2019. [43] J. M. Müller and R. Kunderer. Ex-ante prediction of disruptive innovation: The case of battery technologies. Sustainability, 11(5229), 2019. [44] F. Dotsika and A. Watkins. Identifying potentially disruptive trends by means of keyword network analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119:114–127, 2017. [45] F. Momeni and K. Rost. Identification of disruptive technologies using topic modeling and patent-development paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110:13–24, 2016. [46] R. H. Young, A. D. Sarma, and A. Darzi. Application of text mining methodologies to technology forecasting. Technovation, 28(4):252–262, 2008. [47] R. N. Kostoff, R. Boylan, and G. R. Simons. Disruptive technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2):141–159, 2004. [48] J. Fagerberg. Innovation: A guide to the literature. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pages 1–26, 2004. [49] Sujin Choi, Joshua SungWoo Yang, and Han Woo Park. The triple helix and international collaboration in science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(7):1473–1486, 2014. First published: 16 May 2014. [50] S. Kim, Y. Lee, and Y. Park. Patent analysis for patent mapping. Technovation, 28(11):712–724, 2008. [51] J. Paap and R. Katz. Anticipating disruptive innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(5):13–22, 2004. [52] B. A. Vojak and F. A. Chambers. Roadmapping disruptive technical threats and opportunities in complex, technology-based subsystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2):121–139, 2004. [53] Christoffer Hansson and Bruno F. Abrantes. Strategic adaption (capabilities) and the responsiveness to covid-19’s business environmental threats. pages 1–23, 2023. First Online: 25 October 2023. [54] Selma Vaska, Maurizio Massaro, Ernesto Marco Bagarotto, and Francesca Dal Mas. The digital transformation of business model innovation: A structured literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:539363, 2020. Published online 2021 Jan 7. [55] A. Cingöz and A. A. Akdo˘gan. Strategic flexibility, environmental dynamism, and innovation performance: An empirical study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99:582–589, 2013. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013. 10.528. [56] Jeroen Hopster. What are socially disruptive technologies? Technology in Society, 67:101750, 2021. Under a Creative Commons license. [57] M. Zubizarreta, J. Ganzarain, J. Cuadrado, and R. Lizarralde. Evaluating disruptive innovation project management capabilities. Sustainability, 13(1):1, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010001. [58] Steven Si and Hui Chen. A literature review of disruptive innovation: What it is, how it works and where it goes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 56:101568, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020. 101568. [59] J. Guo, J. Pan, J. Guo, F. Gu, and J. Kuusisto. Measurement framework for assessing disruptive innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139:250–265, February 2019. [60] Jin Chen, Zhaohui Zhu, and Yunting Zhang. A study of factors influencing disruptive innovation in chinese smes. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1):140–157, 2017. Published online: 16 March 2017. [61] C. C. Hang, J. Chen, and D. Yu. An assessment framework for disruptive innovation. Foresight, 13(5):4–13, 2011. [62] M. Keller and S. Hüsig. Ex ante identification of disruptive innovations in the software industry applied to web applications: The case of microsoft’s vs. google’s office applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8):1044–1054, 2009. [63] A. Ganguly, R. Nilchiani, and J. V. Farr. Evaluating disruptive innovation projects: A case of satellite communications. Engineering Management Journal, 20(1):36–42, 2008. [64] L. M. Sainio and K. Puumalainen. Innovation in the network economy: A cross-cultural comparison of finland and hungary. Journal of Euromarketing, 17(1):57–73, 2007. [65] S. Hüsig, C. Hipp, and M. Dowling. Analysing disruptive potential: The case of wireless local area network and mobile communications network companies. Technovation, 25(11):1411–1423, 2005. [66] F. Rafii and P. J. Kampas. How to identify your enemies before they destroy you. Harvard Business Review, 80(11):115–123, 2002. [67] C. M. Christensen, S. D. Anthony, and E. A. Roth. Seeing what’s next: Using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(4):332–334, 2005. [68] P. Klenner, S. Hüsig, and M. Dowling. Ex ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—when are markets ready for disruptive innovations? Research Policy, 42(4):914–927, 2013. [69] P. Klenner, S. Hüsig, and M. Dowling. Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—when are markets ready for disruptive innovations? Research Policy, 42(4):914–927, 2013. [70] Caroline Millar, Nigel Lockett, and Thomas Ladd. Disruption: Technology, innovation, and society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129:254–260, 2018. An examination of how technologies considered disruptive are context-dependent and influenced by factors such as network effects and adoption costs. [71] Ranjay Gulati and Phanish Puranam. Lock-In and Switching Costs. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021. In Introduction to Digital Economics. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-73075-1. [72] P. Strebel. Organizational renewal. Journal of Business Strategy, 8(2):43–51, 1987. [73] S. Klepper. Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1):145–182, 1997. [74] Clayton M. Christensen, Rory McDonald, Elizabeth J. Altman, and Jonathan E. Palmer. Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and directions for future research. Journal of Management Studies, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12349. [75] Raj V. Mahto, Olga Belousova, and Saurabh Ahluwalia. Abundance – a new window on how disruptive innovation occurs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155:119064, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09. 008. [76] Swen Nadkarni and Reinhard Prügl. Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2):233–341, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7. [77] M. Gort and S. Klepper. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. The Economic Journal, 92(367):630–653, 1982. [78] Bill Gates. The age of ai has begun. https://www.gatesnotes.com/The-Age-of-AI-Has-Begun, 2023. Gatesnotes. [79] G. M. Schmidt. The evolution of product innovation in p&g’s connect + develop. Harvard Business Review, 86(12):52–53, 2008. [80] M. Tripsas. Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2-3):79–97, 2008. [81] J. L. Bower and C. M. Christensen. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1):43–53, 1995. [82] Raluca Csernatoni and Bruno Oliveira Martins. Disruptive technologies for security and defence: Temporality, performativity and imagination. Journal of Strategic Studies, pages 849–872, 2023. Research Article. Published online: 19 June 2023. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2224235. [83] P. A. Geroski. Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy, 29(4-5):603–625, 1999. [84] Daniil A. Boiko, Robert MacKnight, and Gabe Gomes. Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2304.05332, 2023. Version 1, April 11, 2023. 48 pages. [85] Suraj Panigrahi. How gpt-4 can change the game in supply chain management. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-gpt- 4-can-change-game-supply-chain-management-suraj-panigrahi/, 2023. [86] Tommy Shevlane, Samuel Farquhar, Ben Garfinkel, Mary Phuong, Jessica Whittlestone, Jade Leung, Daniel Kokotajlo, Nathaniel Marchal, Marie Anderljung, Noemi Kolt, Laurel Ho, Divya Siddarth, Shahar Avin, Will Hawkins, Brian Kim, Iason Gabriel, Varun Bolina, Jack Clark, Yoshua Bengio, and Allan Dafoe. Model evaluation for extreme risks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2305.15324, 2023. [87] Ulrich A. K. Betz, Loukik Arora, Reem A. Assal, Hatylas Azevedo, et al. Game changers in science and technology - now and beyond. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193:122588, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. techfore.2023.122588. [88] L. M. Sainio and K. Puumalainen. Evaluating technology disruptiveness in a strategic corporate context: A case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8):1313–1333, 2007. [89] David Hitch. Artificial intelligence (ai) augmented qualitative analysis: The way of the future? SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4451740, 2023. [90] C. M. Christensen and M. E. Raynor. The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. [91] G. S. Yovanof and G. N. Hazapis. Disruptive technologies, services, or business models? Wireless Personal Communications, 45(4):569–583, 2008. [92] Sebastien Bubeck, Venkat Chandrasekaran, Ran Eldan, Johannes Gehrke, Eric Horvitz, Ece Kamar, Peter Lee, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Scott Lundberg, Harsha Nori, Hamid Palangi, Marco Tulio Ribeiro, and Yi Zhang. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2303.12712, 2023. [93] J. Karimi and Z. Walter. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1):39–81, 2016. [94] S. Marston, Z. Li, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Zhang, and A. Ghalsasi. Cloud computing—the business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1):176–189, 2011. [95] D. W. Arner, J. Barberis, and R. P. Buckley. The evolution of fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 47(4):1271–1319, 2015. [96] C. Fombrun and M. Shanley. What’s in a name? reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2):233–258, 1990. [97] E. Enkel and O. Gassmann. Creative imitation: Exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3):256–270, 2010. [98] Antonio Carmona-Lavado, Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Vesna Vlaisavljevic, and Carmen Cabello-Medina. Cross-industry innovation: A systematic literature review. Technovation, 124:102743, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation.2023.102743. [99] Hans B. Lyng and Eirik C. Brun. Knowledge transition: a conceptual model of knowledge transfer for cross-industry innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 15(5):1–23, 2018. Available at: https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0219877018500438. [100] Andre Behne, Jan Hendrik Beinke, and Frank Teuteberg. A framework for cross-industry innovation: transferring technologies between industries. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(3):1–27, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877021500115. [101] K. J. Boudreau and I. Ziskin. The future of work in the innovation-driven economy. HBS Working Paper Series, (11-147), 2011. [102] Ethan Mollick. It is starting to get strange. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/it-is-starting-to-get-strange, 2023. [103] C. K. Prahalad and V. Ramaswamy. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004. [104] D. K. Rigby, J. Sutherland, and H. Takeuchi. Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94(5):40–50, 2016. [105] M. A. Cusumano, A. Gawer, and D. B. Yoffie. The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. Harper Business, 2019. [106] G. Parker and M. W. Van Alstyne. Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Science, 64(7):3015–3032, 2018. [107] P. Ghemawat. Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8):137–147, 2001. [108] N. M. P. Bocken, S. W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65:42–56, 2014. [109] Mary Anny Moraes Silva Lemstra and Marco Aurélio de Mesquita. Industry 4.0: a tertiary literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186:122204, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122204. [110] Daniel Bendig, Carolin Schulz, Lena Theis, and Sven Raff. Digital orientation and environmental performance in times of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188:122272, 2023. Available at: https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122272. [111] N. Kshetri. Privacy and security issues in cloud computing: The role of institutions and institutional evolution. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4-5):372–386, 2013. [112] F. Provost and T. Fawcett. Data science for business: What you need to know about data mining and data-analytic thinking. 2013. [113] P. Anderson and M. L. Tushman. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4):604–633, 1990. [114] Abhishek Behl, Achint Nigam, and Demetris Vrontis. Guest editorial overview: ‘mapping the future of consumer behaviour using disruptive technologies’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2024. Editorial. First published: 11 February 2024. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2309. [115] Christoph Krienke, Lisa Kolb, Emre Diken, Matthias Streuber, et al. A noninflammatory mrna vaccine for the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science, 371(6525):145–153, 2021. Available at: https://www.science.org/ doi/10.1126/science.abe6555. [116] Minkyung Baek, Frank DiMaio, Ivan Anishchenko, John Dauparas, et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science, 373(6557):871–876, 2021. Available at: https://www.science.org/ doi/10.1126/science.abj8754. [117] Martti Häikiö. Nokia: The Inside Story. Financial Times Prentice Hall, London, UK, 2002. [118] Juan Alcacer, Tarun Khanna, and Christine Snively. The rise and fall of nokia. Harvard Business School Case, 714(428), 2014. Revised June 2020. [119] Timo Peltonen. Case study 4: The collapse of nokia’s mobile phone business: Wisdom and stupidity in strategic decision-making. In Towards Wise Management, pages 163–188. Springer, 2019. [120] Comscore. Comscore reports may 2013 u.s. smartphone subscriber market share. Comscore, Inc., June 28 2013. Retrieved from https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press-Releases/2013/6/comScore-Reports-May-2013-US-Smartphone- Subscriber-Market-Share. [121] Jason Dean and David Pilling. Apple’s Challenge with Overseas Manufacturing. Publisher Name, 2007. [122] N. MacDonald, C. Winckless, and H. Koeppen. Understanding the cnapp market landscape. Journal of Cybersecurity, 29(1):34–50, 2023. | eng |
| dc.rights | Hossein Rouhani Zeidanloo, Miroslav Špaček - 2025 | eng |
| dc.rights.accessrights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | eng |
| dc.rights.coar | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | eng |
| dc.rights.creativecommons | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. | eng |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | eng |
| dc.source | https://revistas.utb.edu.co/tesea/article/view/724 | eng |
| dc.subject | Disruptive innovation | eng |
| dc.subject | disruptive technology | eng |
| dc.subject | disruption process | eng |
| dc.subject | business model innovation | eng |
| dc.subject | IT sector | eng |
| dc.subject | market dynamics | eng |
| dc.title | Identifying disruptive innovation in the IT sector: a framework for evaluating intercompany impact | spa |
| dc.title.translated | Identifying disruptive innovation in the IT sector: a framework for evaluating intercompany impact | spa |
| dc.type | Artículo de revista | spa |
| dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | eng |
| dc.type.coarversion | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | eng |
| dc.type.content | Text | eng |
| dc.type.driver | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | eng |
| dc.type.local | Journal article | eng |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | eng |