Publicación:
TMT Conflict and Innovative Performance: The Moderating Role of Socialization Capabilities and Decision-Making Decentralization

dc.contributor.authorDel Río Cortina, Jorge Luis
dc.contributor.authorVEGA-JURADO, JAIDER
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Florez, Javier
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Centro de Estudios en Negocios e Internacionalización - CENI
dc.contributor.seedbedsSemillero de Investigación en Innovación y Gestión del Conocimiento
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-24T21:26:54Z
dc.date.available2026-02-27
dc.date.issued2026-02-27
dc.descriptionContiene gráficos
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose – This study aims to analyze the influence of conflict within the top management team (TMT) on innovative performance. It considers the moderating roles of socialization capabilities and decentralized decision-making and addresses a theoretical and empirical gap in the literature. Theoretical framework – This study examines the relationship between conflict within the management team and innovative performance. It differentiates between task and relationship conflict and explores the moderating role of socialization capabilities and decentralization. Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative approach was adopted to estimate three theoretical models that allow for the evaluation of relationships between conflict in the TMT and innovation. These models are based on data collected from organizations in various sectors. Findings – The results show that task conflict positively affects innovative performance, while relationship conflict negatively impacts it. Practical & social implications of research – To strengthen TMT leadership, it is recommended that programs be implemented to improve interpersonal skills and foster trust and communication. Additionally, adopting decentralized structures that facilitate innovation is advised. Originality/value – This study provides a novel approach by analyzing the interaction between internal TMT factors and organizational structural factors. Keywords: TMT, innovative performance, socialization capabilities, decision-making.
dc.description.researchareaAnálisis de problemas globales e internacionales
dc.description.tableofcontentsNAspa
dc.description.technicalinfoThe sample was obtained from organizations located in Colombia’s Caribbean region. These organizations are registered with their respective chambers of commerce and have assets equal to or greater than 30,000 times the current legal monthly minimum wage. They also have 50 or more employees and a senior management team. The sample includes organizations from seven departments: Bolívar, Atlántico, Cesar, Córdoba, Guajira, Magdalena, and Sucre. According to the databases of the chamber of commerce of each department, 3,419 organizations were identified that met these criteria. Data collection took place between October 2019 and November 2020. Prior to this, the questionnaires were tested to ensure the questions were understandable to TMT members.
dc.format.extent17 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationDel Rio-Cortina, J, Vega-Jurado, J., & Prieto-Florez, J. (2026). TMT conflict and innovative performance: the moderating role of socialization capabilities and decision-making decentralization. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 28(1), e20250026. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v28i1.4332
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v28i1.4332
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/14513
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRevista Brasileira De Gestão De Negócios
dc.relation.referencesAiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33(6), 912-930. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092683.
dc.relation.referencesAiken, L. S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesJehn, K., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453.
dc.relation.referencesAuh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). The influence of top management team functional diversity on strategic orientations: The moderating role of environmental turbulence and inter-functional coordination. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(3), 333-350. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2004.12.003.
dc.relation.referencesBachrach, D. G., Guedes, M. J., Harms, P. D., & Patel, P. C. (2022). CEO narcissism, top management team transactive memory systems, and firm performance: An upper echelons perspective on CEO admiration and rivalry narcissism. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(1), 61-76. https://doi.org /10.1080/1359432X.2021.1926989.
dc.relation.referencesBantel, K., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.4250100709.
dc.relation.referencesBatarseh, F. S., Daspit, J. J., & Usher, J. M. (2018). The collaboration capability of global virtual teams: Relationships with functional diversity, absorptive capacity, and innovation. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13(1), 1-10. https:// doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2016.1275865.
dc.relation.referencesBedford, D. S., Bisbe, J., & Sweeney, B. (2022). The joint effects of performance measurement system design and TMT cognitive conflict on innovation ambidexterity. Management Accounting Research, 57, 100805. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100805.
dc.relation.referencesCardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.19.10119.
dc.relation.referencesChen, J., & Liu, L. (2020). Reconciling temporal conflicts in innovation ambidexterity: The role of TMT temporal leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1899-1920. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0555.
dc.relation.referencesChen, J., & Liu, L. (2024). TMT entrepreneurial passion diversity and firm innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JKM-12-2022-0961.
dc.relation.referencesChen, M., & Wang, F. (2021). Effects of top management team faultlines in the service transition of manufacturing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 115-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.08.001.
dc.relation.referencesChen, W., Chen, C., & Xiong, X. (2023). Top management team faultlines and corporate industrial diversification: The mediating role of strategic attentional breadth. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1102192. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2023.1102192. PMid:36910789.
dc.relation.referencesCortes-Mejia, S., Cortes, A. F., & Herrmann, P. (2022). Sharing strategic decisions: CEO humility, TMT decentralization, and ethical culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 178(1), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 021-04766-8.
dc.relation.referencesDamanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https:// doi.org/10.2307/256406.
dc.relation.referencesEnsley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365-386. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3.
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Granero, A., Fernández-Mesa, A., Jansen, J. J. P., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2017). Top management team diversity and ambidexterity: The contingent role of shared responsibility and CEO cognitive trust. Long Range Planning, 51(6), 881-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.001.
dc.relation.referencesHashmi, H. B. A., Voinea, C. L., Caniels, M. C. J., Ooms, W., & Abbass, K. (2023). Do top management team diversity and chief sustainability officer make firms greener? Moderating role of top management team behavioral integration. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2536-2547. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2529.
dc.relation.referencesHe, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494. https:// doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078.
dc.relation.referencesHofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage.
dc.relation.referencesHu, Z., Hu, M., Yuan, X., Yu, H., Zou, J., Zhang, Y., & Lu, Z. (2022). Verbal learning, working memory, and attention/ vigilance may be candidate phenotypes of bipolar II depression in Chinese Han nationality. Acta Psychologica, 226, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103563. PMid:35313178.
dc.relation.referencesHuang, H., & Hao, S. (2024). Enterprise digital transformation and sustainable development performance: The asymmetric roles of top management team faultlines. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1670-1685. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3198.
dc.relation.referencesJames, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). r-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306.
dc.relation.referencesJansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.
dc.relation.referencesJansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amj.2005.19573106.
dc.relation.referencesKanchanabha, B., & Badir, Y. F. (2021). Top management Team’s cognitive diversity and the Firm’s ambidextrous innovation capability: The mediating role of ambivalent interpretation. Technology in Society, 64, 101499. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101499.
dc.relation.referencesKumar, A. (2023). Leadership and decision-making: Top management team age demographic and environmental strategy. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.91.
dc.relation.referencesKwan, H. K., Wang, Y., Wu, X., & Ouyang, X. (2025). CEO family harmony and firm product innovation performance: A moderated mediation model of the CEO– TMT interface. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(4), 2019-2038. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.22.
dc.relation.referencesLakshman, C., & Gonzalez, J. (2023). From TMT multiculturalism to strategic agility: Business model innovation in MNEs. Multinational Business Review, 31(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2022-0030.
dc.relation.referencesLi, M., & Liu, K. C. (2022). Let’s explore with a divided team! The effects of top management team demographic faultlines on technological exploration. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(6), 1181-1200. https://doi.org/10.1017/ jmo.2019.87.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, A., Liu, H., Gu, J., Chen, M., & Jin, C. (2024). Business model implementation of new ventures: Linking TMT process antecedents, organizational culture, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(3), 826-855. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231198428.
dc.relation.referencesLiu, J., Fu, P., & Liu, S. (2009). Conflicts in top management teams and team/firm outcomes: The moderating effects of conflict-handling approaches. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20(3), 228-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444060910974867.
dc.relation.referencesLu, C., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Liao, S., & Fu, L. (2021). How TMT diversity influences open innovation: An empirical study on biopharmaceutical firms in China. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 34(2), 151-165. https:// doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1892056.
dc.relation.referencesMa, J., & Huang, X. (2023). TMT experience and corporate social (ir)responsibility: The moderating effects of faultlines. Nankai Business Review International, 14(4), 675-697. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-12- 2021-0087.
dc.relation.referencesMedina, M. N., Ramachandran, I., & Daspit, J. J. (2018). Collaboration or clash? Mapping the effects of top management team conflict on firm absorptive capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(3), 1950023. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S1363919619500233.
dc.relation.referencesMihalache, O. R., Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. (2014). Top management team shared leadership and organizational ambidexterity: Amoderated mediation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 8(6), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1168.
dc.relation.referencesNarayan, S., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. W. (2021). From attention to action: The influence of cognitive and ideological diversity in top management teams on business model innovation. Journal of Management Studies, 58(8), 2082-2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12668.
dc.rightsAutorizo
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc650 - Gerencia y servicios auxiliares::658 - Gerencia general
dc.subject.lembOrganizational innovation
dc.subject.lembExecutive teams
dc.subject.lembDecision making
dc.subject.lembOrganizational behavior
dc.subject.lembLeadership
dc.subject.lembInterpersonal relations
dc.subject.lembCommunication in management
dc.subject.lembConflict management
dc.subject.lembDecentralization in management
dc.subject.lembStrategic planning
dc.subject.ocde5. Ciencias Sociales
dc.subject.odsODS 9: Industria, innovación e infraestructura. Construir infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible y fomentar la innovación
dc.subject.proposalTMTeng
dc.subject.proposalInnovative performanceeng
dc.subject.proposalSocialization capabilitieseng
dc.subject.proposalDecision-making
dc.titleTMT Conflict and Innovative Performance: The Moderating Role of Socialization Capabilities and Decision-Making Decentralizationeng
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dcterms.audiencePublico en generalspa
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication567eecec-764a-4d13-a07b-c914d7d7f341
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa2832f5a-3f8c-47b5-a609-ced0655d226c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication37450834-949a-4584-adbe-961922ded866
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery567eecec-764a-4d13-a07b-c914d7d7f341

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
final_rbgn20250026_EN.pdf
Tamaño:
1.25 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: