Assessment of baseflow separation methods used in the estimations of design-related storm hydrographs across various return periods

Abstract

Accurately estimating storm hydrographs for various return periods is crucial for planning and designing hydrological infrastructure, such as dams and drainage systems. A key aspect of this estimation is the separation of baseflow from storm runoff. This study proposes a method for deriving storm hydrographs for different return periods based on hydrological station records. The proposed approach uses three baseflow separation methods: constant, linear, and master recession curve. A significant advantage of the proposed method over traditional rainfall–runoff approaches is its minimal parameter requirements during calibration. The methodology is tested on records from the Lengupá River watershed in Colombia, using data from the Páez hydrological station, which has a drainage area of 1090 km2. The results indicate that the linear method yields the most accurate hydrograph estimates, as demonstrated by its lower root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.35%, compared to the other baseflow separation techniques, the values of which range from 2.92 to 3.02%. A frequency analysis of hydrological data was conducted using Pearson Type III and Generalized Extreme Value distributions to identify the most suitable statistical models for estimating extreme events regarding peak flow and maximum storm hydrograph volume. The findings demonstrate that the proposed methods effectively reproduce storm hydrographs for return periods ranging from 5 to 200 years, providing valuable insights for hydrological design, which can be employed using the data from stream gauging stations in rivers.