Publicación:
Lignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PET-degrading enzymes from mangrove soil

dc.contributor.authorPeña-Valencia, Maria Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorRobaina Estévez, Semidán
dc.contributor.authorCuster, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorTurak, Onur
dc.contributor.authorSierra Alfonso, Felipe
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Lucas William
dc.contributor.authorRubiano Labrador, Diana Carolina
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Jay
dc.contributor.authorVaksmaa, Annika
dc.contributor.authorDini-Andreote, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorRosado, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorReyes, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorJimenez Avella, Diego Javier
dc.contributor.researchgroupGrupo de Investigación Estudios Químicos y Biológicos
dc.contributor.seedbedsSemillero de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T19:36:55Z
dc.date.available2026-04-07
dc.date.issued2026-03-20
dc.descriptionContiene ilustraciones, gráficos
dc.description.abstractMangroves are ecosystems located at land–sea transition zones, where they are continuously exposed to plant biomass and plastic pollution. Their soils harbor extensive microbial diversity with potential for discovering polymer-degrading enzymes. Here, we perform a microcosm experiment to examine how mangrove soil microbial communities respond to inputs of lignocellulose or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in the presence and absence of seawater, and to explore the selection of putative PET-active enzymes (PETases) using gene- and genomeresolved metagenomics. Incubation conditions lead to a gradual increase in salinity, resulting in the enrichment of halophilic taxa, including spore-forming bacteria and archaeal species, particularly in seawater-depleted treatments. Lignocellulose input is the primary driver of soil microbial community restructuring, followed by seawater presence. In dry, lignocellulose amended microcosms (L treatment), microbial diversity is significantly reduced, while lignocellulolytic taxa within the phyla Bacillota and Actinomycetota are enriched. Twelve potential PETases are identified in the L treatment, sharing >70% sequence similarity with known PETases, and three are predicted to be thermostable. Two putative PETases from Microbulbifer species display distinct sequence and structural features, thereby expanding the currently limited PETase sequence landscape. This study demonstrates that perturbing environmental microbiomes with plant-derived polymers represents a promising strategy for capturing novel PETases.
dc.description.researchareaBioinformática aplicada
dc.description.researchareaMicroorganismos de ambientes extremos
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract Introduction Materials and methods Results Discussion Conclusions References
dc.description.technicalinfoNo aplicaeng
dc.format.extent15 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationPeña-Valencia, M.F., Robaina-Estévez, S., Custer, G.F. et al. Lignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PETdegrading enzymes from mangrove soil. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71548-z
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71548-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/14408
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Communications
dc.relation.referencesDonato, D. et al. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 4, 293-297 (2011).
dc.relation.referencesRahman, M.M. et al. Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 12, 3875 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesAndreote, F.D. et al. The microbiome of Brazilian mangrove sediments as revealed by metagenomics. PLoS One. 7, e38600 (2012).
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J. et al. Compositional profile of α/β-hydrolase fold proteins in mangrove soil metagenomes: prevalence of epoxide hydrolases and haloalkane dehalogenases in oil-contaminated sites. Microb. Biotechnol. 8,604-613(2015). 5.
dc.relation.referencesAllard, S.M. et al. Introducing the Mangrove Microbiome Initiative: identifying microbial research priorities and approaches to better understand, protect, and rehabilitate mangrove ecosystems. mSystems. 5, e00658-20 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesYuan, Z., Zeng, Z., & Liu, F. Community structures of mangrove endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria in Zhangjiangkou National Mangrove Nature Reserve. Sci Rep.13, 17127 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesNag, S. et al. Halotolerant and halophilic bacteria present in the mangrove ecosystem: emerging bioengineering potentials. In: Sarma H, Joshi SJ, editors. Biotechnology of emerging microbes. Progress in biochemistry and biotechnology. London: Academic Press; 2024. p.143-62. doi:10.1016/B978-0-443-15397-6.00010-3.
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J. et al. Microbial community characterization in Red Sea-derived samples using a field-deployable DNA extraction system and nanopore sequencing. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5928577/v1 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesVázquez-Rosas-Landa, M. et al. Impact of seasonal flooding and hydrological connectivity loss on microbial community dynamics in mangrove sediments of the southern Gulf of Mexico. PeerJ. 13, e19371 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesHülsen, S., Dee, L.E., Kropf, C.M., Meiler, S. & Bresch, D.N. Mangroves and their services are at risk from tropical cyclones and sea level rise under climate change. Commun Earth Environ. 6, 262 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesLacerda, L.D., Ferreira, A.C., Ward, R., & Borges, R. Editorial: Mangroves in the Anthropocene: from local change to global challenge. Front For Glob Change. 5, 993409 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesHan, L. et al. Microplastics alter soil structure and microbial community composition. Environ Int. 185, 108508 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo, F. et al. Effects of hydroclimatic change and rehabilitation activities on salinity and mangroves in the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. Wetlands. 38, 755-767 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesWang, X. & Zhu, X. Salinity stress and atmospheric dryness co-limit evapotranspiration in a subtropical monsoonal estuarine mangrove wetland. Environ Res Lett. 19, 114067 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesMendes, D.S., Beasley, C.R., Silva, D.N.N. & Fernandes, M.E.B. Microplastic in mangroves: a worldwide review of contamination in biotic and abiotic matrices. Mar Pollut Bull. 195, 115552 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesDeakin, K., Porter, A., Osorio Baquero, A., & Lewis, C. Plastic pollution in mangrove ecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Mar Pollut Bull. 218, 118165 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesDing, J. et al. Depth heterogeneity of lignin-degrading microbiome and organic carbon processing in mangrove sediments. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 11, 5 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesMamidala, H.P. et al. Interspecific variations in leaf litter decomposition and nutrient release from tropical mangroves. J Environ Manage. 328, 116902 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesGarcés-Ordóñez, O., Castillo-Olaya, V.A., Granados-Briceño, A.F., Blandón García, L.M. & Espinosa Díaz, L.F. Marine litter and microplastic pollution on mangrove soils of the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean. Mar Pollut Bull. 145, 455- 462 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesMartin, C. et al. Exponential increase of plastic burial in mangrove sediments as a major plastic sink. Sci Adv. 6, eaz5593 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesPawano, O. et al. Exploring untapped bacterial communities and potential polypropylenedegrading enzymes from mangrove sediment through metagenomics analysis. Front Microbiol. 15, 1347119 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesPaixão, D.A.A. et al. Microbial enrichment and meta-omics analysis identify CAZymes from mangrove sediments with unique properties. Enzyme Microb Technol. 148, 109820 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesDasSarma, S. & DasSarma, P. Halophiles and their enzymes: negativity put to good use. Curr Opin Microbiol. 25, 120-6 (2015).
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J. et al. Engineering the mangrove soil microbiome for selection of polyethylene terephthalate-transforming bacterial consortia. Trends Biotechnol. 43,162- 183 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesDanso, D. et al. New Insights into the Function and Global Distribution of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)-Degrading Bacteria and Enzymes in Marine and Terrestrial Metagenomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 84(8), e02773-17 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesWei, R., Westh, P., Weber, G., Blank, L.M. & Bornscheuer, U.T. Standardization guidelines and future trends for PET hydrolase research. Nat Commun. 16, 4684. (2025).
dc.relation.referencesJoo, S. et al. Structural insight into molecular mechanism of poly(ethylene terephthalate) degradation. Nat Commun. 9, 382 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesTurak, O. et al. A third type of PETase from the marine Halopseudomonas lineage. Pre print at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.31.630877 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesYoshida, S. et al. A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate). Science. 351, 1196-9 (2016).
dc.relation.referencesChen, J. et al. Global marine microbial diversity and its potential in bioprospecting. Nature. 633, 371-9 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, G. et al. Structural insights and engineering of deep-sea halophilic PET hydrolytic enzymes. Preprint at doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.30.673199 (2025)
dc.relation.referencesWei, R., Weber, G., Blank, L.M. & Bornscheuer, W.T. Process insights for harnessing biotechnology for plastic depolymerization. Nat Chem Eng. 2, 110-7 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesBell, E.L. et al. Directed evolution of an efficient and thermostable PET depolymerase. Nat Catal. 5, 673-81 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesCordero, I., Leizeaga, A., Hicks, L.C., Rousk, J. & Bardgett, R.D. High intensity perturbations induce an abrupt shift in soil microbial state. ISME J. 17, 2190-9 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesDelmont, T.O. et al. Reconstructing rare soil microbial genomes using in situ enrichments and metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 6, 358. (2015).
dc.relation.referencesSaidu, M.B. et al. Exploring the biodegradation of PET in mangrove soil and its intermediates by enriched bacterial consortia. Environ Technol. (2025).
dc.relation.referencesZhao, S. et al. Biodegradation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) by diverse marine bacteria in deep-sea sediments. Environ Microbiol. 25, 2719-31 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J., Sanchez, A. & Dini-Andreote, F. Engineering microbiomes to transform plastics. Trends Biotechnol. 42, 265-8 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesChen, C.C., Dai, L., Ma, L. & Guo, R.T. Enzymatic degradation of plant biomass and synthetic polymers. Nat Rev Chem. 4, 114-26 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesCai, F.M. et al. Guidelines toward ecologically-informed bioprospecting for microbial plastic degradation. Biotechnol Adv. 82, 108590 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J. et al. Merging plastics, microbes, and enzymes: highlights from an international workshop. Appl Environ Microbiol. 88, e0072122 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesBastida, F. et al. Soil microbial diversity-biomass relationships are driven by soil carbon content across global biomes. ISME J. 15, 2081-91 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesHe, X. et al. Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle. Nat Commun. 15, 8010 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, J. et al. A global assessment of mangrove soil organic carbon sources and implications for blue carbon credit. Nat Commun. 15:8994 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesJiménez, D.J., Dini-Andreote, F., DeAngelis, K.M., Singer, S.W., Salles, J.F & van Elsas, J.D. Ecological insights into the dynamics of plant biomass-degrading microbial consortia. Trends Microbiol. 25, 788-96 (2017).
dc.relation.referencesWang, C. & Kuzyakov, Y. Mechanisms and implications of bacterial-fungal competition for soil resources. ISME J. 18, wrae073 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesRatzke, C., Barrere, J. & Gore, J. Strength of species interactions determines biodiversity and stability in microbial communities. Nat Ecol Evol. 4, 376-83 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesKnight, C.G. et al. Soil microbiomes show consistent and predictable responses to extreme events. Nature. 636, 690-6 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesPotts, L.D. et al. Chronic environmental perturbation influences microbial community assembly patterns. Environ Sci Technol. 56, 2300-11 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesRath, K.M., Fierer, N., Murphy, D.V. & Rousk, J. Linking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients. ISME J. 13, 836-46 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesRath, K.M., Maheshwari, A. & Rousk, J. Linking microbial community structure to trait distributions and functions using salinity as an environmental filter. mBio. 10, e01607-19 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesSzékely, A.J., Berga, M. & Langenheder, S. Mechanisms determining the fate of dispersed bacterial communities in new environments. ISME J. 7, 61-71 (2013).
dc.relation.referencesChapman, S.K., Hayes, M.A., Kelly, B. & Langley, J.A. Exploring the oxygen sensitivity of wetland soil carbon mineralization. Biol Lett. 15, 20180407 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesLuo, M., Huang. J.F., Zhu, W.F. & Tong, C. Impacts of increasing salinity and inundation on rates and pathways of organic carbon mineralization in tidal wetlands: a review. Hydrobiologia. 827, 31-49 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesRodríguez Del Río, Á., Scheu. S. & Rillig, M.C. Soil microbial responses to multiple global change factors as assessed by metagenomics. Nat Commun. 16, 5058 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y.R. et al. Vulnerability of soil food webs to chemical pollution and climate change. Nat Ecol Evol. 9, 1112–1119 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesMandic-Mulec, I., Stefanic, P. & van Elsas, J.D. Ecology of Bacillaceae. Microbiol Spectr. 3, TBS-0017-2013 (2015).
dc.relation.referencesYeager, C.M. et al. Polysaccharide degradation capability of Actinomycetales soil isolates from a semiarid grassland of the Colorado Plateau. Appl Environ Microbiol. 83, e03020-16 (2017).
dc.relation.referencesAsha, K. & Bhadury, P. Myceligenerans indicum sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from mangrove sediment of Sundarbans, India. Arch Microbiol. 203, 1577-85 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesKearns, P.J. et al. Nutrient enrichment induces dormancy and decreases diversity of active bacteria in salt marsh sediments. Nat Commun. 7, 12881 (2016)
dc.relation.referencesYang, Y. et al. Differential responses of soil extracellular enzyme activities to salinization: implications for soil carbon cycling in tidal wetlands. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 36, e2021GB007285 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesEkborg, N.A. et al. Saccharophagus degradans gen. nov., sp. nov., a versatile marine degrader of complex polysaccharides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 55, 1545-9 (2005).
dc.relation.referencesKlimek, D., Herold, M. & Calusinska, M. Comparative genomic analysis of Planctomycetota potential for polysaccharide degradation identifies biotechnologically relevant microbes. BMC Genomics. 25, 523 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesKündgen, M., Jogler, C. & Kallscheuer, N. Substrate utilization and secondary metabolite biosynthesis in the phylum Planctomycetota. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 109, 123 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesHollister, E.B. et al. Shifts in microbial community structure along an ecological gradient of hypersaline soils and sediments. ISME J. 4, 829-38 (2010).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, C.J. et al. Diversity, metabolism and cultivation of archaea in mangrove ecosystems. Mar Life Sci Technol. 3, 252-62 (2020)
dc.relation.referencesPeng, H., Ruiz-Moreno, A.J. & Fu, J. Multi-dimensional metagenomics. Nat Rev Bioeng (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-025-00346-x
dc.relation.referencesKim, N. et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics: a game changer for microbiome medicine. Exp Mol Med. 56, 1501-12 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesDelgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 359, 320-5 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesSulaiman, S. et al. Isolation of a novel cutinase homolog with polyethylene terephthalatedegrading activity from leaf-branch compost by using a metagenomic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol. 78, 1556-62 (2012).
dc.relation.referencesArnal, G. et al. Assessment of four engineered PET degrading enzymes considering large-scale industrial applications. ACS Catal. 13, 13156-66 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesPerez-Garcia, P. et al. An archaeal lid-containing feruloyl esterase degrades polyethylene terephthalate. Commun Chem. 6, 193 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesAlam, I. et al. Widespread distribution of bacteria containing PETases with a functional motif across global oceans. ISME J. 19, wraf121 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesCarletti, A. et al. Functional and structural characterization of PETase SM14 from marine-sponge Streptomyces sp. active on polyethylene terephthalate. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 13, 7460-8 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesWeigert, S. et al. Investigation of the halophilic PET hydrolase PET6 from Vibrio gazogenes. Protein Sci. 31, e4500 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesMeyer-Cifuentes, I.E. et al. B. Synergistic biodegradation of aromatic-aliphatic copolyester plastic by a marine microbial consortium. Nat Commun. 11, 5790 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesBlázquez-Sánchez, P. et al. Antarctic polyester hydrolases degrade aliphatic and aromatic polyesters at moderate temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 88, e0184221 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesBlázquez-Sánchez, P. et al. Engineering the catalytic activity of an Antarctic PETdegrading enzyme by loop exchange. Protein Sci. 32, e4757 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesRuginescu, R. & Purcarea, C. Plastic-degrading enzymes from marine microorganisms and their potential value in recycling technologies. Mar Drugs. 22, 441 (2024). 80. Erickson, E. et al. Sourcing thermotolerant polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase scaffolds from natural diversity. Nat Commun. 13, 7850 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesQi, X., Ji, M., Yin, C.F., Zhou, N.Y. & Liu, Y. Glacier as a source of novel polyethylene terephthalate hydrolases. Environ Microbiol. 25, 2822-33 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesda Costa C.H.S. et al. Assessment of the PETase conformational changes induced by poly(ethylene terephthalate) binding. Proteins. 89, 1340-52 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesXu, S., Huo, C. & Chu, X. Unraveling the interplay between stability and flexibility in the design of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolases. J Chem Inf Model. 64, 7576- 89 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesHerlemann, D.P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571-9 (2011).
dc.relation.referencesCallahan, B.J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 13, 581-3 (2016).
dc.relation.referencesMartin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10-2 (2011).
dc.relation.referencesKursa, M.B. & Rudnicki, W.R. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J Stat Softw. 36, 1-13 (2010).
dc.relation.referencesLove, M.I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
dc.relation.referencesFriedman, J. & Alm, E.J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012).
dc.relation.referencesBastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc Int AAAI Conf Web Soc Media. 3, 361-2 (2009).
dc.relation.referencesAndrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ Accessed [20 jul 2023].
dc.relation.referencesBolger, A.M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 30, 2114-20 (2014).
dc.relation.referencesWood, D.E., Lu. J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesLu, J., Breitwieser, F.P., Thielen, P. & Salzberg, S.L. Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput Sci. 3, e104 (2017).
dc.relation.referencesOksanen, J. et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.2-0. 2014. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan Accessed [20 jul 2023].
dc.relation.referencesVirtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 17, 261-72 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesRideout, J.R. et al. biocore/scikit-bio: scikit-bio 0.5.9: more compositional methods added. Zenodo (2024). doi:10.5281/zenodo.2254379
dc.relation.referencesLi, D., Liu, C.M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K.& Lam, T.W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast singlenode solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 31, 1674-6 (2015
dc.relation.referencesGurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. &Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 29, 1072-5 (2013).
dc.relation.referencesLangmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 9, 357-9 (2012).
dc.relation.referencesWu, Y.W., Simmons, B.A. & Singer, S.W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 32, 605-7 (2016).
dc.relation.referencesKang, D.D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 7:e7359 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesNissen, J.N. et al. Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders. Nat Biotechnol. 39, 555-60 (2021).
dc.relation.referencesSieber, C.M.K. et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol. 3, 836-43 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesParks, D.H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C.T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G.W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043-55 (2015).
dc.relation.referencesBowers, R.M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 35, 725-31 (2017)
dc.relation.referencesChaumeil, P.A., Mussig, A.J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D.H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 36, 1925-7 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesTanizawa, Y., Fujisawa, T. & Nakamura, Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics. 34, 1037-9 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesHyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 11, 119 (2010).
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-García, L., Bugg, T.D.H., Jiménez, D.J. Exploring the lignin catabolism potential of soil-derived lignocellulolytic microbial consortia by a gene-centric metagenomic approach. Microb Ecol. 80, 885-96 (2020).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, H. et al. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W95-101 (2018).
dc.relation.referencesBuchholz, P.C.F. et al. Plastics degradation by hydrolytic enzymes: the plasticsactive enzymes database (PAZy). Proteins. 90, 1443-56 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesBuchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson. D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 12, 59-60 (2015).
dc.relation.referencesEisenhofer, R., Odriozola, I. & Alberdi, A. Impact of microbial genome completeness on metagenomic functional inference. ISME Commun. 3, 12 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesEspinoza, J.L & Dupont, C.L. VEBA: a modular end-to-end suite for in silico recovery, clustering, and analysis of prokaryotic, microeukaryotic, and viral genomes from metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 23, 419 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesZallot, R., Oberg. N. & Gerlt. J.A. The EFI web resource for genomic enzymology tools: leveraging protein, genome, and metagenome databases to discover novel enzymes and metabolic pathways. Biochemistry. 58, 4169-82 (2019).
dc.relation.referencesShannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-504 (2003).
dc.relation.referencesEdgar, R.C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics. 5, 113 (2004).
dc.relation.referencesPrice, M.N., Dehal, P.S. & Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2: approximately maximumlikelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 5, e9490 (2010).
dc.relation.referencesLetunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W78-82 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesTeufel, F. et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat Biotechnol. 40, 1023-5 (2022).
dc.relation.referencesHiller, K., Grote, A., Scheer, M., Münch. R. & Jahn, D. PrediSi: prediction of signal peptides and their cleavage positions. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W375-9 (2004).
dc.relation.referencesLin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science. 379, 1123-30 (2023).
dc.relation.referencesCorso, G. et al. The discovery of binding modes requires rethinking docking generalization. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). 2024. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10656052.
dc.relation.referencesRodella, C., Lazaridi, S. & Lemmin, T. TemBERTure: advancing protein thermostability prediction with deep learning and attention mechanisms. Bioinform Adv. 4, vbae103 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesZhu, M., Song, Y., Yuan, Q. & Yang, Y. Accurately predicting optimal conditions for microorganism proteins through geometric graph learning and language model. Commun Biol. 7, 1709 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesLi, B. & Ming, D. GATSol, an enhanced predictor of protein solubility through the synergy of 3D structure graph and large language modeling. BMC Bioinformatics. 25, 204 (2024).
dc.relation.referencesBoorla, V.S. & Maranas, C.D. CatPred: a comprehensive framework for deep learning in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters. Nat Commun. 16, 2072 (2025).
dc.relation.referencesCock, P.J. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 25, 1422-3 (2009).
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2302-9 (2005).
dc.relation.referencesPeña-Valencia MF. Lignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PET-degrading enzymes from mangrove soil. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18651101. 2026.
dc.relation.referencesRobaina-Estévez S. Lignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PET-degrading enzymes from mangrove soil. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18656903. 2026.
dc.rightsThe authors declare no competing interestseng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-SA 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc570 - Biología
dc.subject.lembManglares -- Microbiología
dc.subject.lembMicrobiología ambiental
dc.subject.lembBiodegradación
dc.subject.lembPlásticos -- Degradación
dc.subject.lembMangroves -- Microbiology
dc.subject.lembPolímeros -- Biodegradación
dc.subject.lembEnvironmental Microbiology
dc.subject.lembBiodegradation
dc.subject.lembPolymers -- Biodegradation
dc.subject.lembPlastics -- Degradation
dc.subject.ocde1. Ciencias Naturales
dc.subject.odsODS 14: Vida submarina. Conservar y utilizar sosteniblemente los océanos, los mares y los recursos marinos para el desarrollo sostenible
dc.subject.proposalMangroveseng
dc.subject.proposalMetagenomics
dc.subject.proposalMicrobiome perturbations
dc.subject.proposalPolyethylene terephthalate
dc.subject.proposalPlastic degradation
dc.titleLignocellulose-mediated selection of potential halophilic PET-degrading enzymes from mangrove soil
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dcterms.audienceComunidad académica
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa157a452-2e56-4dd8-ba5c-684bbe7a2635
relation.isAuthorOfPublication01389cb1-7600-4345-815b-e4668c5d7516
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5c4f0a6e-f1db-4b65-9136-815d13d0cd6e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6df75638-aa32-419a-b8c0-bf5fa2109b24
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2a6fc50d-2506-4fa0-afa9-102ba397e726
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf39a4e95-119f-419b-8f29-a7f7e7eabb37
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf9568341-e5fb-4286-bbb7-a3c65ddd044d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication583d8e39-559d-4ce0-a6ca-6c0c739f4a9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6df75638-aa32-419a-b8c0-bf5fa2109b24

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Paper_Nature.pdf
Tamaño:
6.28 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: