Urban hydrological models are critical for flood risk management. However, the availability of high-resolution topographic data for reliable outputs remains challenging in data-scarce cities. Therefore, determining data quality in producing reliable information is fundamental. We evaluated open-source and proprietary topographic data for use in the two-dimensional hydrological model City Catchment Analysis Tool (CityCAT). We modelled 12 scenarios using combinations of open-source and light detection and ranging (LiDAR)-generated datasets, validating the results with community-generated flood risk maps. The findings show high agreement with scenarios using LiDAR-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) (bootstrapped Spearman’s ρ ≈ 0.90). However, open-source building footprints performed better, demonstrating that both are necessary for reliable urban flood risk mapping. As LiDAR is costly with limited access, we urge for publicly available high-resolution datasets for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) disproportionately impacted by climate change. Therefore, we address this gap by focusing on a Latin American context with Cartagena de Indias (Colombia) as a case study.