Publicación:
An assessment of regional and urban innovation systems in Colombia

dc.contributor.authorAlean Romero Andrés
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Castilla, Tania Isabel
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-15T19:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-01
dc.description.abstractThis study calculates efficiency scores for the Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) and Urban Innovation Systems (UIS) of Colombia using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and identifies key determinants based on the Triple Helix model of innovation. We assess how regions and cities convert R&D investment and labor into measurable outputs such as patent activity and scientific publications. The results reveal significant heterogeneity in efficiency, with scores clustered at both extremes, suggesting that while some regions are highly efficient innovators, others lag considerably behind. Panel data models are used to explore explanatory factors behind this divergence. The findings indicate that regions with a broader supply of high-quality universities and denser business activity tend to perform better. In urban contexts, worker satisfaction emerges as a critical driver of innovation, highlighting the role of intrapreneurship—employees who innovate from within organizations—as a key mechanism. Additionally, the speed of legal proceedings enhances regional outcomes by reducing uncertainty and enabling a more agile and supportive environment for innovation-related activities. These results offer actionable insights for designing policies to strengthen Colombia’s innovation capacity at both the urban and regional levels.
dc.format.extent5 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationAleán-Romero, A., Castilla, T.J. (2026). An Assessment of Regional and Urban Innovation Systems in Colombia. In: Novo-Corti, I., Picatoste, X., Valeri, M. (eds) Human Resource Development for Sustainability and Social Responsibility. EDaSS2025 2025. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09683-8_16
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-032-09683-8_16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/14523
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Switzerland AG
dc.publisher.placeColombia
dc.relation.referencesAntoncic, J., & Antoncic, B. (2011). Employee satisfaction, intrapreneurship and firm growth: A model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111133560
dc.relation.referencesAnwar, M., & Sha, S. (2018). Managerial networking and business model innovation: Empirical study of new ventures in an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2018.1490509
dc.relation.referencesAyala, Y., Peiró, J., & Tordera, N. (2017). Job Satisfaction and Innovative performance in young Spanish employees: Testing new patterns in the happy-productive worker thesis – A discriminant study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9778-1
dc.relation.referencesBailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/520
dc.relation.referencesConcejo Privado de Competitividad. (2022). Índice de Competitividad de Departamentos y Ciudades. Concejo Privado de Competitividad.
dc.relation.referencesDe Clerk, D., Castañer, X., & Belausteguigoitia, I. (2010). Entrepreneurial initiative selling within organizations: Towards a more comprehensive motivational framework. Journal of Management Studies, 48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00999.x
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Nacional de Planeación. (2023). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2022–2026: Colombia, Potencia Mundial de la Vida. Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix model: University-industry–government innovation in action. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesEtzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix – University-industry-government relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14, 14–19.
dc.relation.referencesFeng, Y. (2021). Technological progress, intellectual property protection and economic growth [Ph.D. Dissertation, Nankai University].
dc.relation.referencesFeng, Y., Zhang, H., & Chiu, Y. (2021). Innovation efficiency and the impact of the institutional quality: A cross-country analysis using the two-stage meta-frontier dynamic network Dea model. Scientometrics, 126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03829-3
dc.relation.referencesGiannikis, S., & Nikandrou, I. (2013). The impact of corporate entrepreneurship and high-performance work systems on employees’ job attitudes: Empirical evidence from Greece during the economic downturn. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.778316
dc.relation.referencesHu, X., Li, X., & Rousseau, R. (2021). Mathematical reflections on triple helix calculations. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04114-7
dc.relation.referencesJovanovic, M., Savic, G., & Cai, Y. (2022). Towards a triple helix based efficiency index of innovation systems. Scientometrics, 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04304-x
dc.relation.referencesKaiser, U., Kongsted, H., Laursen, K., & Ejsing, A. (2018). Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2907
dc.relation.referencesKang, W., Zhao, S., & Song, W. (2019). Triple helix in the science and technology innovation centers ff China from the perspective of mutual information: A comparative study between Beijing and Shanghai. Scientometrics, 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03017-y
dc.relation.referencesKaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430
dc.relation.referencesKlein. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1351494
dc.relation.referencesLandström, H., Harirchi, G., & Aström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009
dc.relation.referencesMustafa, M., Martin, L., & Hughes, M. (2016). Psychological ownership, job satisfaction, and middle manager entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815627360
dc.relation.referencesNeessen, P., Caniels, M., Vos, B., et al. (2024). The intrapreneurial employee: Toward an integrated model of intrapreneurship and research agenda. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0552-1
dc.relation.referencesOstrom, E. (2005). Unlocking public entrepreneurship and public economies. Wider Discussison Paper.
dc.relation.referencesPatra, S., & Muchie, M. (2018). Research and innovation in south African universities: From the triple helix’s perspective. Scientometrics, 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2764-0
dc.relation.referencesPerkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
dc.relation.referencesPhuc, N., Schinckus, C., & Dinh, S. (2018). Do economic openness and institutional quality influence patents? Evidence from GMM systems estimates. The International Economy, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.10.002
dc.relation.referencesPierce, J., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378028
dc.relation.referencesPinchot. (1987). Innovation through Intrapreneuring. Research Management, 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1987.11757021
dc.relation.referencesRomer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3210
dc.relation.referencesTebaldi, E., & Elmslie, B. (2013). Does institutional quality impact innovation? Evidence from cross-country patent grant data. Applied Economics, 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613777
dc.relation.referencesWerker, C., Ubacht, J., & Ligtvoet, A. (2017). Networks of entrepreneurs driving the triple helix: Two cases of the Dutch energy system. Triple Helix, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-017-0047-z
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank. (2022a). Patent applications, residents – Colombia. World Bank.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank. (2022b). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. World Bank.
dc.relation.referencesZahoor, N., & Al-Tabbaab, O. (2020). Inter-organizational collaboration and SMES’ innovation: A systematic review and future research directions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2020.101109
dc.relation.referencesZemtzov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2019). An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: The application of the DEA approach. Scientometrics, 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc300 - Ciencias sociales::303 - Procesos sociales
dc.subject.lembTechnological innovations — Colombia
dc.subject.lembRegional innovation systems -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembUrban innovation -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembPatents -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembRegional planning -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembEconomic development -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembInnovation management -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembIndustrial productivity -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembResearch, Industrial -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembResearch and development -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembScience and technology policy -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembUniversities and colleges -- Cooperation with industry -- Colombia
dc.subject.lembTechnology transfer -- Colombia
dc.subject.ocde5. Ciencias Sociales
dc.subject.odsODS 9: Industria, innovación e infraestructura. Construir infraestructuras resilientes, promover la industrialización inclusiva y sostenible y fomentar la innovación
dc.subject.proposalPatent activity
dc.subject.proposalRegional Innovation Systems
dc.subject.proposalUrban Innovation Systems
dc.subject.proposalData envelopment analysis
dc.subject.proposalRandom effects
dc.titleAn assessment of regional and urban innovation systems in Colombia
dc.typeCapítulo - Parte de Libro
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.contentText
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication05296eb9-d150-47d6-b864-0ab844ce8f8d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery05296eb9-d150-47d6-b864-0ab844ce8f8d

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
An Assessment of Regional_Springer Nature2025.pdf
Tamaño:
313.35 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
14.49 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: