Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorToro González, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Philip
dc.contributor.authorWinfree, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-10T20:25:39Z
dc.date.available2021-02-10T20:25:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.date.submitted2021-02-08
dc.identifier.citationPhilip Watson, Jason Winfree,b and Daniel Toro-González (2020) “Fiscal Impacts and Cross-Border Effects of a Change in State Liquor Policy,” Journal of Food Distribution Research, July, pp. 1–18.spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9981
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the economic effects of the 2012 change in liquor policy (Initiative 1183) in Washington State in the United States. This policy increased the availability of liquor but also increased taxes on liquor in Washington. This research provides some evidence that the quantity of liquor sold in both Washington and Idaho increased, suggesting that availability/convenience effects can outweigh tax/price effects. Furthermore, the cross-border spillover effects are isolated to the nearest store to the border.spa
dc.format.extent18 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Food Distribution Research Volume 51, Issue 2, pp. 1–18.spa
dc.titleFiscal impacts and cross-border effects of a change in state liquor policyspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAnselin, L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs. 1997. “Local Geographic Spillovers between University Research and High Technology Innovations.” Journal of Urban Economics 42(3): 422–448.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArcidiacono, P., H. Sieg, and F. Sloan. 2007. “Living Rationally under the Volcano? an Empirical Analysis of Heavy Drinking and Smoking.” International Economic Review 48(1): 37–65.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAsplund, M., F. Richard, and F. Wilander. 2007. “Demand and Distance: Evidence on Crossborder Shopping.” Journal of Public Economics 91: 141–157.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBaltagi, B.H. and J.M. Griffin. 1995. “A Dynamic Demand Model for Liquor: The Case for Pooling.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77(3): 545–554.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBeatty, T.K., E.R. Larsen, and D.E. Sommervoll. 2009. “Driven to Drink: Sin Taxes Near a Border.” Journal of Health Economics 28(6): 1175–1184.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBurge, G., and C. Rogers. 2011. “Local Option Sales Taxes and Consumer Spending Patterns: Fiscal Interdependence under Multi-Tiered Local Taxation.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 41(1): 46–58.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChiou, L. and E. Muehlegger. 2008. “Crossing the Line: Direct Estimation of Cross-Border Cigarette Sales and the Effect on Tax Revenue.” BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8(1): 1–41.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCotti, C., R. A. Dunn, and N. Tefft. 2015. “The Great Recession and Consumer Demand for Alcohol: A Dynamic Panel-Data Analysis of US Households.” American Journal of Health Economics 1(3): 297–325.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEvans, W.N., and T.J. Moore. 2012. “Liquidity, Economic Activity, and Mortality.” Review of Economics & Statistics 94(2): 400–418.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFeng, S., and M. Patton. 2017. “Empirical Analysis of Differential Spillover Effects Within a Growth Equilibrium Framework: Urban–Rural versus Rural–Rural Linkages.” Papers in Regional Science 96(4): 743–758.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFerraro, A.P. 2014. “Serving the People: Evaluating Initiative 1183 & Liquor Privatization in Washington State.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 76: 427.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFogarty, J. 2010. “The Demand for Beer, Wine and Spirits: A Survey of the Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 24(3): 428–478.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGallet, C.A. 2007. “The Demand for Alcohol: A Meta-Analysis of Elasticities.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 51(2): 121–135.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGeys, B. 2006. “Looking across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence Using Local Government Efficiency Ratings.” Journal of Urban Economics 60(3): 443–462.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHigh, J., and C.A. Coppin. 1988. “Wiley and the Whiskey Industry: Strategic Behavior in the Passage of the Pure Food Act.” Business History Review 62(2): 286–309.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHogeland, W. 2010. The Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the Frontier Rebels Who Challenged America's Newfound Sovereignty. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMulia, N., S.E. Zemore, R. Murphy,H. Liu, and R. Catalano. 2014. “Economic Loss and Alcohol Consumption and Problems during the 2008 to 2009 US Recession.” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 38(4): 1026–1034.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPublic Health Institute. 2016, June 28. “Years after Liquor Privatization, Washington State Residents Regret Vote to End State Monopoly.” Public Health Institute. Available online: https://www.phi.org/press/years-after-liquor-privatization-washington-state-residents-regretvote- to-end-state-monopoly/.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRogers, C.L. 2004. “Local Option Sales Tax (LOST) Policy on the Urban Fringe.” Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy 34(1): 27–50.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRorabaugh, W.J. 1991. “Alcohol in America.” OAH Magazine of History 6(2): 17–19.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRuhm, C. 2007. “A Healthy Economy Can Break Your Heart.” Demography 44(4): 829–848.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRuhm, C.J., A.S. Jones, K.A. McGeary, W.C. Kerr, J.V. Terza, T.K. Greenfield, and R.S. Pandian. 2012. “What US Data Should Be Used to Measure the Price Elasticity of Demand for Alcohol?” Journal of Health Economics 31(6): 851–862.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSelvanathan, S., amd S. Selvanathan. 2005. The Demand for Alcohol, Tobacco and Marijuana: International Evidence. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSiegel, M., W. DeJong, A.B. Albers, T.S. Naimi, and D.H. Jernigan. 2013. “Differences in Liquor Prices between Control State‐Operated and License‐State Retail Outlets in the United States.” Addiction 108(2): 339–347.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStehr, M. 2007. “The Effect of Sunday Sales Bans and Excise Taxes on Drinking and Cross— Border Shopping for Alcoholic Beverages.” National Tax Journal 60(1): 85–105.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSubbaraman, M.S., and W.C. Kerr. 2016. “Opinions on the Privatization of Distilled-Spirits Sales in Washington State: Did Voters Change Their Minds?” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 77(4): 568–576.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationToro-González, D. J.J. McCluskey, and R.C. Mittelhammer. 2014. “Beer Snobs Do Exist: Estimation of Beer Demand by Type.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39(2): 1–14.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWilliams, F.J., Chaloupka, and H. Wechsler. 2005. “Are There Differential Effects of Price and Policy on College Students ‘Drinking Intensity’?” Contemporary Economic Policy 23(1): 78–90.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWinfree, J.A., and P. Watson. 2015. “Substitution of Liquor Sales across States.” Applied Economics Letters 22(11): 891–894.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYe, Y., and W.C. Kerr. 2016. “Estimated Increase in Cross‐Border Purchases by Washington Residents Following Liquor Privatization and Implications for Alcohol Consumption Trends.” Addiction 111(11): 1948–1953.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYing, L.G. 2000. “Measuring the Spillover Effects: Some Chinese Evidence.” Papers in Regional Science 79(1): 75–89.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationYoung, D.J., and A. Bielinska-Kwapisz. 2003. “Alcohol Consumption, Beverage Prices and Measurement Error.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64(2): 235–238.spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.identifier.urlhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305480
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.identifier.doi10.22004/ag.econ.305480
dc.subject.keywordsFiscal impactsspa
dc.subject.keywordsLiquor policyspa
dc.subject.keywordsRegulationspa
dc.subject.keywordsSpatial spilloversspa
dc.subject.keywordsVertical restraintsspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.publisher.placeCartagena de Indiasspa
dc.type.spahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.audiencePúblico generalspa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - 2017 Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución No 961 del 26 de octubre de 1970 a través de la cual la Gobernación de Bolívar otorga la Personería Jurídica a la Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.