Show simple item record

dc.creatorBarrios A.
dc.creatorDuque M.
dc.creatorCanu M.
dc.creatorVilla J.L.
dc.creatorChevrel P.
dc.creatorGrisales V.H.
dc.creatorPrieto F.
dc.creatorPanche S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T16:32:53Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T16:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Engineering Education; Vol. 29, Núm. 6; pp. 1551-1563
dc.identifier.issn0949149X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/9068
dc.description.abstractThis article describes an Academic Evaluation Protocol (AEP) designed and implemented in order to monitor various modalities of using an Automatic Control Laboratory by analyzing the quality of work that can be obtained from a specific student group when the proposed experimental practice is being conducted according to a particular type of lab-work modality. To serve this purpose, the types of use-modalities associated to different lab-works are classified as follows: Local Real Laboratory (RL), Remote Laboratory (R@L) and Local plus Remote Laboratory (RL+R@L). To estimate how a specific lab-work modality impacts upon the development of an experimental practice, parameters such as average utilization time and the ABET-Indicators are used. The results obtained from this pedagogical instrument are analyzed by various means, namely the ANOVA Test, a Descriptive Statistical Technique and Wilcoxon Testing. The findings reveal that the student groups involved in experimental lab-practices following the RL and RL+R@L modalities achieve better performance (when conducting the automatic control laboratory) than the student groups served with the remote system only. The analysis performed indicates that there is no statistical difference between working at the Local Laboratory (RL) or at a Local plus Remote Laboratory (RL+R@L). As a result, the use of the remote system combined with the local one does not improve significantly the ABET score, ruling out the idea that by placing special interest in using only the remote system, an improvement in students' comprehension is achieved. © 2013 TEMPUS Publications.eng
dc.format.mediumRecurso electrónico
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourcehttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84891961447&partnerID=40&md5=281d56f8a172c2d234106b8b75c64a9a
dc.titleAcademic evaluation protocol for monitoring modalities of use at an Automatic Control Laboratory: Local vs. remote
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMarchisio, S., Lerro, F., Von Pamel, O., (2010) Use of a Remote Laboratory to Promote Meaningful Learning in the Teaching of Electronic Devices, pp. 129-139. , Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación. ISSS: 1133-8482 - N° 38 July-December
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGarcia-Zubia, J., Hernandez, U., Angulo, I., Acceptance, usability and usefulness of WebLab-Deusto from the students point of view (2009) International Journal of Online Engineering (IJOE), 5 (1), pp. 1-7
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGobbo, F., Vaccari, M., Open standards for higher education in robotics by immersive telelaboratories (2005) IEEE Computer Society, 7, p. 3. , Learning Technology Newsletter
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIndrusiak, L.S., Glesner, M., Reis, R., On the evolution of remote laboratories for prototyping digital electronic systems (2007) IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, 54 (6). , Dec
dcterms.bibliographicCitation(1996) Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities, , The Boyer Commission on Education Undergraduates in the Research University
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLewis, T., Coming to terms with engineering design as content (2005) Journal of Technology Education, 16, pp. 37-54
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHaury, D.L., Rillero, P., (1994) Perspectives of Hands-On Science Teaching, , The ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education. Columbus, OH 43210-1080. Posted to NCREL
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGrim, L., Yarnold, P.R., (1994) Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics, , American Psychological Association. Washington D.C
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBen-Dor, A., Bruhn, L., Friedman, N., Tissue classification with gene expression profiles (2000) Journal of Computational Biology, pp. 559-583
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCabrera, A.F., Colbeck, C.L., Terenzini, P.T., Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering (2001) Research in Higher Education, 42 (3)
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBarrios, A., Panche, S., Duque, M., Grisales, V.H., Prieto, F., Villa, J., Chevrel, P., Canu, M., A multi-user remote academic laboratory system (2013) Computers and Education, 62, pp. 111-122
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWolf, K., Stevens, E., The role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning (2007) The Journal of Effective Teaching, 7 (1), pp. 3-14
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNelder, J.A., The statistics of linear models: Back to basics (1994) Statistics and Computing, 4, pp. 221-234
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKirk, R.E., (1995) Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, , Third edition. Brooks/Cole
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRuiz-Primo, M.A., Briggs, D., Iverson, H., Talbot, R., Shepard, L.A., (2011) Impact of Undergraduate Science Course Innovations on Learning Science, 331. , 11 March, Published by AAAS
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMattaloni, M., Kofman, H., Lucero, P., (2005) La Realidad de la Experimentación Ísica en Laboratorios Remotos, , 1er. Congreso en Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias. TICEC05, La Plata, Argentina - September
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStone, M., Perrone, V., Prkins, D., Wilson, D., (1998) Teaching for Understanding, , San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGelman, A., (2006) Analysis of Variance, , Department of Statistics and Department of Political Science, Columbia University, New York, March
dcterms.bibliographicCitation(2010) ANOVA/MANOVA, , http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/anova-manova/?button=1, StatSofi, Accessed 10 July 2012
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWilcoxon signed-rank test (2009) Handbook of Biological Statistics, , http://udel.edu/~mcdonald/statsignedrank.html, Accessed 25 July 2012
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBarsalou, L.W., (2008) Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, p. 617
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZacharia, Z.C., Loizou, E., Papaevripidou, M., (2012) Early Child. Res. Q., 27, p. 447
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZacharia, Z.C., Olympiou, G., Papaevripidou, M., (2008) J. Res. Sci. Teach., 45, p. 1021
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRenken, M.D., Nunez, N., (2012) Learn. Instr., 23, p. 10
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDe Jong, T., Linn, M.C., Zacharia, Z.C., Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education (2013) Science, 340, p. 305
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHofstein, A., Lunetta, V.N., The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research (1982) Review of Educational Research, 52 (2), pp. 201-217
dcterms.bibliographicCitation(2007) The Integral Role of Laboratory Investigations in Science Instruction, , www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCox, D.R., (2006) Principles of Statistical Inference, , Cambridge New York: Cambridge University
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMcBeath, R.J., (1992) Instructing and Evaluating in Higher Education: A Guidebook for Planning Learning Outcomes, , Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitationImhoff, K., (2012) Engineering ABET Cheat Sheet, , Drexel University
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ec
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.subject.keywordsABET Indicators
dc.subject.keywordsAcademic Evaluation Protocol (AEP)
dc.subject.keywordsLocal laboratory
dc.subject.keywordsRemote laboratory
dc.subject.keywordsBetter performance
dc.subject.keywordsControl Laboratory
dc.subject.keywordsEvaluation protocol
dc.subject.keywordsQuality of work
dc.subject.keywordsRemote laboratories
dc.subject.keywordsRemote systems
dc.subject.keywordsStatistical differences
dc.subject.keywordsStatistical techniques
dc.subject.keywordsAutomation
dc.subject.keywordsControl
dc.subject.keywordsInstrument testing
dc.subject.keywordsProcess control
dc.subject.keywordsStudents
dc.subject.keywordsResearch laboratories
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.ccAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívar
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio UTB
dc.type.spaConferencia
dc.identifier.orcid55499187700
dc.identifier.orcid7004864427
dc.identifier.orcid26647351600
dc.identifier.orcid55498635300
dc.identifier.orcid6602908026
dc.identifier.orcid6507137176
dc.identifier.orcid56689499100
dc.identifier.orcid55499203900


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - 2017 Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución No 961 del 26 de octubre de 1970 a través de la cual la Gobernación de Bolívar otorga la Personería Jurídica a la Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.