Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMothes, Cornelia
dc.contributor.authorMellado, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorGarcés-Prettel, Miguel
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-03T14:23:17Z
dc.date.available2024-07-03T14:23:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-22
dc.date.submitted2024-07-02
dc.identifier.citationMothes, C., Mellado, C., Boudana, S., Himma, M., Nolan, D., McIntyre, K., Kozman, C., Hallin, D. C., Amiel, P., Brin, C., Katherine Chen, Y.-N., Davydov, S., De Maio, M., Dingerkus, F., El-Ibiary, R., Frías Vázquez, M., Glück, A., Garcés-Prettel, M., Luisa Humanes, M., … Van Leuven, S. (2024). Spurring or Blurring Professional Standards? The Role of Digital Technology in Implementing Journalistic Role Ideals in Contemporary Newsrooms. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241246692spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/12688
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the perceived relevance and implementation of competing normative ideals in journalism in times of increasing use of digital technology in newsrooms. Based on survey and content analysis data from 37 countries, we found a small positive relationship between the use of digital research tools and “watchdog” performance. However, a stronger and negative relationship emerged between the use of digital audience analytics and the performance of “watchdog” and “civic” roles, leading to an overall increase in conception–performance gaps on both roles. Moreover, journalists’ use of digital community tools was more strongly and positively associated with “infotainment” and “interventionism.”spa
dc.description.abstractEste estudio examina la relevancia percibida y la aplicación de ideales normativos contrapuestos en el periodismo en los tiempos del creciente uso de la tecnología digital en las salas de redacción. Basándonos en datos de encuesta y análisis de contenido de 37 países, encontramos una pequeña relación positiva entre el uso de herramientas de investigación digitales y el desempeño de los “perros guardianes”. Sin embargo, surgió una relación más fuerte y negativa entre el uso de análisis de audiencia digital y el desempeño de roles de “perro guardián” y “cívico”, llevando a un aumento general en las brechas concepción-desempeño en ambos roles. Además, el uso de herramientas de la comunidad digital por parte de los periodistas estaba más fuerte y positivamente asociado con el “infoentretenimiento” y el “intervencionismo”.spa
dc.format.extent16 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.sourceJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterlyspa
dc.titleSpurring or Blurring Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 1–32 © 2024 AEJMC Professional Standards? The Role of Digital Technology in Implementing Journalistic Role Ideals in Contemporary Newsroomsspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBelair-Gagnon, V., Nelson, J. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2019). Audience engagement, reciprocity, and the pursuit of community connectedness in public media journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(5), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1542975spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBjerknes, F. (2022). Images of transgressions: Visuals as reconstructed evidence in digital investigative journalism. Journalism Studies, 23(8), 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/14 61670X.2022.2061574spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBlanchett, N. (2021). Participative gatekeeping: The intersection of news, audience data, news- workers, and economics. Digital Journalism, 9(6), 773–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/2167 0811.2020.1869053spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBunce, M. (2019). Management and resistance in the digital newsroom. Journalism, 20(7), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916688963spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCarson, A., & Farhall, K. (2018). Understanding collaborative investigative journalism in a “post-truth” age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616 70X.2018.1494515spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChristin, A. (2018). Counting clicks: Quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1382–1415. https://doi. org/10.1086/696137spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationChua, S., & Westlund, O. (2019). Audience-centric engagement, collaboration culture and platform counterbalancing. Media and Communication, 7(1), 153–165. https://doi. org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1760spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCohen, N. S. (2019). At work in the digital newsroom. Digital Journalism, 7(5), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1419821spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCostera Meijer, I. (2020). Understanding the audience turn in journalism. Journalism Studies, 21(16), 2326–2342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1847681spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEdgerly, S., & Vraga, E. (2019). News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism, 20(6), 807–826. https://doi. org/10.1177/1464884917730spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFawzi, N., & Mothes, C. (2020). Perceptions of media performance: Expectation-evaluation discrepancies and their relationship with media-related and populist attitudes. Media and Communication, 8(3), 335–347. https://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3142spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFerrer-Conill, R., & Tandoc, E. C. (2018). The audience-oriented editor. Digital Journalism, 6(4), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1440972spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFerrucci, P. (2020). It is in the numbers: How market orientation impacts journalists’ use of news metrics. Journalism, 21(2), 244–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807056spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFlegel, R. C.,& Chaffee, S. H.(1971). Influencesofeditors, readers, andpersonalopinionsonreport- ers. Journalism Quarterly, 48(4), 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907104800404spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFürst, S. (2020). In the service of good journalism and audience interests? How audience metrics affect news quality. Media and Communication, 8(3), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.17645/ mac.v8i3.3228spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25621396spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross- platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital Journalism 11(8), 1499–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/2167 0811.2022.2128389spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHayes, K. (2024). The networked newsroom: Navigating news boundaries of work. Journalism Practice 18(4), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1949627spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHimma-Kadakas, M., & Ojamets, I. (2022). Debunking false information: Investigating journal- ists’ fact-checking skills. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/216 70811.2022.2043173spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHumayun, M. F., & Ferrucci, P. (2022). Understanding social media in journalism practice: A typol- ogy. Digital Journalism, 10(9), 1502–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2086594spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHwang, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2018). Influence of discussion incivility on deliberation: An examination of the mediating role of moral indignation. Communication Research, 45(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKunert, J., Frech, J., Brüggemann, M., Lilienthal, V., & Loosen, W. (2022). How investigative journalists around the world adopt innovative digital practices. Journalism Studies, 23(7), 761–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2033636spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLamot, K., & Paulussen, S. (2020). Six uses of analytics: Digital editors’ perceptions of audi- ence analytics in the newsroom. Journalism Practice, 14(3), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1 080/17512786.2019.1617043spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLawrence, R. G., Radcliffe, D., & Schmidt, T. R. (2018). Practicing engagement: Participators journalism in the Web 2.0 era. Journalism Practice, 12(10), 1220–1240. https://doi.org/10 .1080/17512786.2017.1391712spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLin, B., & Lewis, S. C. (2022). The one thing journalistic AI just might do for democracy. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1627–1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2084131spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLowrey, W., & Woo, C. W. (2010). The news organization in uncertain times: Business or institution? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(1), 41–61. https://doi. org/10.1177/107769901008700103spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMäder, A., & Rinsdorf, L. (2023). Constructive journalism as an adaptation to a changing media environment. Journalism Studies, 24(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616 70X.2022.2159859spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMellado, C. (Ed.). (2020). Beyond journalistic norms: Role performance and news in compara- tive perspective. Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMellado, C., & Hermida, A. (2023). The journalist on social media: Mapping the promoter, celebrity and joker roles on Twitter and Instagram. Digital Journalism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2151484spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMellado, C., & Mothes, C. (2020). Measuring the link between professional role conceptions, perceived role enactment, and journalistic role performance across countries. In C. Mellado (Ed.), Beyond journalistic norms: Role performance and news in comparative perspective (pp. 147–166). Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMellado, C., Mothes, C., Hallin, D. C., Humanes, M. L., Lauber, M., Mick, J., Silke, H., Sparks, C., Amado, A., Davydov, S., & Olivera, D. (2020). Investigating the gap between newspa- per journalists’ role conceptions and role performance in nine European, Asian, and Latin American countries. The International Journal of Press/politics, 25(4), 552–575. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1940161220910106spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMerkley, E. (2018). Partisan bias in economic news content: New evidence. American Politics Research, 47(6), 1303–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18821954spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMoran, R. E., & Shaik, S. J. (2022). Robots in the news and newsrooms: Unpacking meta- journalistic discourse on the use of artificial intelligence in journalism. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2085129spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMoreno-Gil, V., Ramon, X., & Rodríguez-Martínez, M. (2021). Fact-checking interventions as counteroffensives to disinformation growth: Standards, values, and practices in Latin America and Spain. Media and Communication, 9(1), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.17645/ mac.v9i1.3443spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMoreno-Gil, V., Ramos-Vegas, X., & Mauri-Ríos, M. (2022). Bringing journalism back to its roots: Examining fact-checking practices, methods, and challenges in the Mediterranean context. Profesional de la información, 31(2), Article e310215. https://doi.org/10.3145/ epi.2022.mar.15spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMosco, V. (2019). Social media versus journalism and democracy. Journalism, 20(1), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918807611spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMothes, C., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Pearson, G. (2019). The PFAD-HEC model: Impacts of news attributes and use motivations on selective news exposure. Communication Theory, 29(3), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qty033spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNelson, J. L. (2021). The next media regime: The pursuit of “audience engagement” in journalism. Journalism, 22(9), 2350–2367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919862375spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNelson, J. L., & Tandoc, E. C., Jr. (2019). Doing “well” or doing “good”: What audience ana- lytics reveal about journalism’s competing goals. Journalism Studies, 20(13), 1960–1976. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1547122spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNeuberger, C., Nuernbergk, C., & Langenohl, S. (2019). Journalism as multichannel com- munication. Journalism Studies, 20(9), 1260–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616 70X.2018.1507685spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNewman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/ files/2023-06/Digital_News_Report_2023.pdfspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOtto, L., Glogger, I., & Boukes, M. (2016). The softening of journalistic political communica- tion. Communication Theory, 27(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12102spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPowers, M., & Vera-Zambrano, S. (2018). How journalists use social media in France and the United States. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2728–2744. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444817731566spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSchudson, M. (2011). The sociology of news (2nd ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSchulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2020). We are the people and you are fake news: A social identity approach to populist citizens’ false consensus and hostile media perceptions. Communication Research, 47(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociol- ogy perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSinger, J., Lewis, S. C., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2023). Journalism in the Quarterly: A century of change in the industry and the academy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(4), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231189455spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSkovsgaard, M., & Andersen, K. (2020). Conceptualizing news avoidance: Towards a shared understanding of different causes and potential solutions. Journalism Studies, 21(4), 459– 476. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1686410spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationStrömbäck, J. (2023). Political alternative media as a democratic challenge. Digital Journalism, 11(5), 880–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2178947spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTandoc, E. C., Jr. (2015). Why web analytics click: Factors affecting the ways journalists use audience metrics. Journalism Studies, 16(6), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616 70X.2014.946309spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTandoc, E. C., Jr., Hellmueller, L., & Vos, T. (2013). Mind the gap: Between role conception and role enactment. Journalism Practice, 7(5), 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/1751278 6.2012.726503spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTandoc, E. C., Jr., & Thomas, R. J. (2015). The ethics of web analytics. Digital Journalism, 3(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.909122spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVan Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hube, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high- choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationvan Dalen, A., de Vreese, C., & Albæk, E. (2012). Different roles, different content? A four- country comparison of the role conceptions and reporting styles of political journalists. Journalism, 13(7), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431538spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69(2), 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWeaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. Lawrence Erlbaum.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWelbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N., & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595474spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWojcieszak, M., & Garrett, R. K. (2018). Social identity, selective exposure, and affective polarization: How priming national identity shapes attitudes toward immigrants via news selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/ hqx010spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationZhang, X., & Li, W. (2020). From social media with news: Journalists’ social media use for sourcing and verification. Journalism Practice, 14(10), 1193–1210. https://doi.org/10.108 0/17512786.2019.1689372spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecspa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10776990241246692
dc.subject.keywordsNews qualityspa
dc.subject.keywordsRole conceptionspa
dc.subject.keywordsRole performancespa
dc.subject.keywordsAudience metricsspa
dc.subject.keywordsSocial mediaspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.publisher.placeCartagena de Indiasspa
dc.subject.armarcLEMB
dc.type.spahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.audiencePúblico generalspa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.publisher.disciplineComunicación Socialspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - 2017 Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución No 961 del 26 de octubre de 1970 a través de la cual la Gobernación de Bolívar otorga la Personería Jurídica a la Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.