Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVásquez, Jenifer
dc.contributor.authorAguirre, Santiago
dc.contributor.authorPuertas, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorBruno, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorPriarone, Paolo C.
dc.contributor.authorSettineri, Luca
dc.coverage.spatialColombia
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-22T21:29:16Z
dc.date.available2021-09-22T21:29:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-28
dc.date.submitted2021-09-08
dc.identifier.citationJenifer Vásquez, Santiago Aguirre, Edwin Puertas, Giulia Bruno, Paolo C. Priarone, Luca Settineri, A sustainability maturity model for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) based on a data analytics evaluation approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 311, 2021, 127692, ISSN 0959-6526, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127692.spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12585/10367
dc.description.abstractA maturity model for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) is introduced to assess the level of implementation of sustainability strategies and practices in this type of business. According to the literature, only a few sustainability-maturity assessment models intended for MSMEs have integrated the following three factors: environmental knowledge management, environmental strategies and good practices, and environmental management systems. The sustainability maturity model proposed here for MSMEs is capable of supporting the efforts of companies in their attempts to achieve both environmental sustainability and an improvement in their production systems. The model encompasses a four-level qualitative scale and uses supervised classification algorithms to categorize companies through data analysis techniques. After applying the model to a group of MSMEs from different productive sectors in Colombia, the results have shown that 6% of the companies were at an insufficient level, 31% were at an initial level, 45% at a developed sustainability maturity level, and 18% at a consolidated level. This result implies that the decision makers in the latter group have paid greater attention to the strengthening of sustainability progress capabilities and, hence, to the definition of a maturation route.spa
dc.format.extent13 páginas
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Cleaner Production, vol. 311, 2021spa
dc.titleA sustainability maturity model for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) based on a data analytics evaluation approachspa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAboelmaged, M., 2018. The drivers of sustainable manufacturing practices in Egyptian SMEs and their impact on competitive capabilities: a PLS-SEM model. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.053. Alpaydin, E., 2016. In: Machine Learning : the New AI. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationArbolino, R., De Simone, L., Carlucci, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Ioppolo, G., 2018. Towards a sustainable industrial ecology: implementation of a novel approach in the performance evaluation of Italian regions. J. Clean. Prod. 178, 220–236. https://doi. org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.12.183.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBacklund, F., Chron´eer, D., Sundqvist, E., 2014. Project management maturity models – a critical review. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 119, 837–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2014.03.094. Bancoldex, ´ 2017. Clasificacion ´ de empresas en Colombia.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBiscotti, A.M., D’Amico, E., Monge, F., 2018. Do environmental management systems affect the knowledge management process? The impact on the learning evolution and the relevance of organisational context. J. Knowl. Manag. 22, 603–620. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0344. Brundtland, G.-H., 1987. Our Common Future: the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, New York.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationBureau van Dijk, 2020. Bureau van Dijk | private company information – Orbis [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb. accessed 2.27.20spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCaldera, H.T.S., Desha, C., Dawes, L., 2019. Evaluating the enablers and barriers for successful implementation of sustainable business practice in ‘lean’ SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 218, 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.239.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCarmona-Calvo, M.A., Suarez, ´ E.M., Calvo-Mora, A., Peria´nez-Crist ˜ obal, ´ R., 2016. Sistemas de gestion ´ de la calidad: un estudio en empresas del sur de Espana ˜ y norte de Marruecos. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 22, 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. iedee.2015.10.001.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCater, ˇ B., Cater, ˇ T., Praˇsnikar, J., Ivaˇskovi´c, I., 2018. Environmental strategy and its implementation: what’s in it for companies and does it pay off in a posttransition context? J. East Eur. Manag. Stud. 23, 55–88. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181- 2018-1-55. Fig. 10. The SMMM system. J. Vasquez ´ et al. Journal of Cleaner Production 311 (2021) 127692 13spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDharmawan, Y.S., Divinagracia, G.G., Woods, E., Kwong, B., 2019. Inter-dependencies on BPM maturity model capability factors in deriving BPM roadmap. Procedia Comput. Sci. 161, 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.220.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEdvardsson, I.R., Yigitcanlar, T., Pancholi, S., 2016. Knowledge city research and practice under the microscope: a review of empirical findings. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 14, 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-016-0003-0. EFQM, 2020. EFQM model [WWW Document]. URL. https://www.efqm.org/index.ph p/efqm-model/. accessed 6.17.20.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEllefsen, A.P.T., Ole´skow-Sz ´ łapka, J., Pawłowski, G., Toboła, A., 2019. Striving for excellence in ai implementation: ai maturity model framework and preliminary research results. Logforum 15, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.17270/J. LOG.2019.354.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFernandez-Lozano, C., Gestal, M., Munteanu, C.R., Dorado, J., Pazos, A., 2016. A methodology for the design of experiments in computational intelligence with multiple regression models. PeerJ 2016 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2721spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFroger, M., B´enaben, F., Truptil, S., Boissel-Dallier, N., 2019. A non-linear business process management maturity framework to apprehend future challenges. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 49, 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.013spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationFushiki, T., 2011. Estimation of prediction error by using K-fold cross-validation. Stat. Comput. 21, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-009-9153-8. Golinska, P., Kuebler, F., 2014. The method for assessment of the sustainability maturity in remanufacturing companies. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier, pp. 201–206. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.018.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHeikkurinen, P., Young, C.W., Morgan, E., 2019. Business for sustainable change: extending eco-efficiency and eco-sufficiency strategies to consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 218, 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.02.053spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHsu, C.H., Chang, A.Y., Luo, W., 2017. Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs – integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. J. Clean. Prod. 161, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.063. ISO, 2020. ISO - certification [WWW document]. ISO. https://www.iso.org/certification. html accessed 6.17.20.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationISO, 2015. ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems — requirements with guidance for use. ISO/TC 207/SC 1 Environ. Manag. Syst [WWW Document]. https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html. accessed 2.27.20.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJohnson, M.P., 2017. Knowledge acquisition and development in sustainability-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises: exploring the practices, capabilities and cooperation. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 3769–3781.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJohnstone, L., 2020. A systematic analysis of environmental management systems in SMEs: possible research directions from a management accounting and control stance. J. Clean. Prod. 244 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118802.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJov´e-Llopis, E., Segarra-Blasco, A., 2018. Eco-efficiency actions and firm growth in European SMEs. Sustain. Times 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010281.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationKlyueva, I., 2019. Improving quality of the multiclass SVM classification based on the feature engineering. In: Proceedings - 2019 1st International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modelling, Automation and Energy Efficiency, SUMMA 2019. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 491–494. https://doi. org/10.1109/SUMMA48161.2019.8947599spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLacerda, T.C., von Wangenheim, C.G., 2018. Systematic literature review of usability capability/maturity models. Comput. Stand. Interfac. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. csi.2017.06.001.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLin, T.C., Wang, K.J., Sheng, M.L., 2020. To assess smart manufacturing readiness by maturity model: a case study on Taiwan enterprises. Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf. 33, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1699255spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLopes, C.M., Scavarda, A., Hofmeister, L.F., Thom´e, A.M.T., Vaccaro, G.L.R., 2017. an analysis of the interplay between organizational sustainability, knowledge management, and open innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 476–488. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.083.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMatinaro, V., Liu, Y., Lee, T.R., Poesche, J., 2019. Extracting key factors for sustainable development of enterprises: case study of SMEs in Taiwan. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.280.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMoreno-Sandoval, L.G., Puertas, E., Plaza-Del-Arco, F.M., Pomares-Quimbaya, A., Alvarado-Valencia, J.A., Alfonso Urena-L ˜ opez, ´ L., 2019. Celebrity profiling on twitter using sociolinguistic features notebook for PAN at CLEF 2019. CEUR Workshop Proc.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMukherjee, A., Mukhopadhyay, S., Panigrahi, P.K., Goswami, S., 2019. Utilization of oversampling for multiclass sentiment analysis on amazon review dataset. In: 2019 IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Aware. Sci. Technol. iCAST 2019 - Proc, pp. 1–6. https://doi. org/10.1109/ICAwST.2019.8923260.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNascimento, G., Araujo, C.A.S., Alves, L.A., 2017. Corporate sustainability practices in accredited Brazilian hospitals: a degree-of-maturity assessment of the environmental dimension. Rev. Adm. 52, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.10.001.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOdwazny, ˙ F., Wojtkowiak, D., Cyplik, P., Adamczak, M., 2019. Concept for measuring organizational maturity supporting sustainable development goals. Logforum 15, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2019.321.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPaez, ´ G., Rohvein, C., Paravie, D., Jaureguiberry, M., 2018. Revision ´ de modelos de madurez en la gestion ´ de los procesos de negocios. Ingeniare Rev. Chil. Ing. 26, 685–698. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33052018000400685.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationParker, D.W., Loh, A., Chevers, D., Minto-Coy, I., Zeppetella, L., 2017. Operations sustainability maturity model: preliminary findings of financial services in developing and developed countries. Meas. Bus. Excell. 21, 309–336. https://doi. org/10.1108/MBE-08-2016-0044.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPatil, S., Sonavane, S., 2020. Minority–majority mix mean oversampling technique: an efficient technique to improve classification of imbalanced data sets. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Springer, pp. 501–509. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-32-9515-5_48.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPlasencia Soler, J.A., Marrero Delgado, F., Bajo Sanju´ an, A.M., Nicado García, M., 2018. Modelos para evaluar la sostenibilidad de las organizaciones. Estud. Gerenciales 34, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2018.146.2662.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSantos-Neto, J.B.S. dos, Costa, A.P.C.S., 2019. Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review. Enterprise Inf. Syst. 13, 719–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17517575.2019.1575986.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSchwan, G., 2019. Sustainable development goals. GAIA. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia .28.2.1.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationShi, X., Baba, T., Osagawa, D., Fujishima, M., Ito, T., 2019. A maturity model for sustainable system implementation in the era of smart manufacturing. IEEE Int. Conf. Emerg. Technol. Fact. Autom. ETFA 2019-Septe 1649–1652. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ETFA.2019.8869446.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTsiliki, G., Munteanu, C.R., Seoane, J.A., Fernandez-Lozano, C., Sarimveis, H., Willighagen, E.L., 2015. RRegrs: an R package for computer-aided model selection with multiple regression models. J. Cheminf. 7, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13321-015-0094-2.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVasquez, ´ J., Aguirre, S., Fuquene-Retamoso, C.E., Bruno, G., Priarone, P.C., Settineri, L., 2019. A conceptual framework for the eco-efficiency assessment of small- and medium-sized enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 237 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2019.117660.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVon Scheel, H., Von Rosing, G., Skurzak, K., Hove, M., 2014. BPM and maturity models. In: The Complete Business Process Handbook: Body of Knowledge from Process Modeling to BPM. Elsevier Inc., pp. 395–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 799959-3.00019-7spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWatz, M., Hallstedt, S.I., 2020. Profile model for management of sustainability integration in engineering design requirements. J. Clean. Prod. 247, 119155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119155.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWBCSD, 2009. Learning module [WWW Document]. URL. http://www.wbcsd.org/Proje cts/Education/Resources/Eco-efficiency-Learning-Module. accessed 2.5.18.spa
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWeber, R., 2017. Design-science research. In: Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts, second ed., pp. 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08- 102220-7.00011-X.spa
datacite.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.hasversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccessspa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127692
dc.subject.keywordsSustainabilityspa
dc.subject.keywordsMaturity modelspa
dc.subject.keywordsData analyticsspa
dc.subject.keywordsSmall and medium-sized enterprisesspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.ccAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.identifier.instnameUniversidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.identifier.reponameRepositorio Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívarspa
dc.publisher.placeCartagena de Indiasspa
dc.subject.armarcLEMB
dc.type.spahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
oaire.resourcetypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar - 2017 Institución de Educación Superior sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional. Resolución No 961 del 26 de octubre de 1970 a través de la cual la Gobernación de Bolívar otorga la Personería Jurídica a la Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar.